• philosloppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    the only thing more aggravating than using imperial is having to listen to all the complaining about how metric is better. We get it, bro; it’s out of our control at this point

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    My 2 main annoyances with the metric system:

    First: The SI unit for mass is the kilogram. That’s fucking stupid. A kilogram is 1000 grams, the base unit for something can’t be “1000 of this other thing”. Because the kilogram is the SI unit for mass, that means that a gram is, by definition, 1/1000th of a kilogram. The stupidity, it burns!

    The second one isn’t really an issue with the metric system, it’s more when people are almost using the metric system then fuck it up, like the “Watt Hour” for measuring energy use. You know, there’s already a way of measuring energy use: the “Watt Second”, also known as “The Joule”

  • Mobiuthuselah@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I use both in my wood shop. Sometimes it’s easier to lay things out in metric or divide numbers, but other times it’s easier to remember an imperial number to go make a cut.

  • CAVOK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “In metric, one milliliter of water occupies one cubic centimeter, weighs one gram, and requires one calorie of energy to heat up by one degree centigrade—which is 1 percent of the difference between its freezing point and its boiling point. An amount of hydrogen weighing the same amount has exactly one mole of atoms in it. Whereas in the American system, the answer to ‘How much energy does it take to boil a room-temperature gallon of water?’ is ‘Go fuck yourself,’ because you can’t directly relate any of those quantities.” ― Josh Bazell, Wild Thing

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s not helpful for us seriously distracted people. To remember a number, I must remember a smaller number. Damn, how many was it? Three tomatoes? Eight tomatoes?

  • UnwrittenProtagonist@lemmyusa.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Because we are free men, we will be free to measure liquids in liters and milliliters… but not all liquids, only soda, wine, and alcohol because for milk and paint we will use gallons, pints, and quarts, god willing”

    “How many liters are in a gallon, sir?” “Nobody knows.”

    “Why not use meters and kilometers?” “We sill, soldier. But only in certain unpopular sports like track and swimming.”

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    All units of measure are abstract.

    I like metric because it’s structured around an abstract amount. Even something like Celsius is pretty abstract, because the freezing and boiling point of water changes depending on the atmospheric pressure. The measure of a second? Why is a second, 1 second long? Why is it 1/60th of 1/60th of 1/24th of a day? There’s other stuff based on seconds too, like Hertz, which is literally “cycles per second”

    I like to think about how abstract these things are, because if we were to ever try to communicate with a truly alien race, we couldn’t really use numbers, because their base numbering system would be different than ours, their symbols for numbers would be different, their entire understanding of math and how to calculate stuff could be wildly different, possibly because they understand things we do not. We couldn’t even say to them to communicate on a specific frequency of EM, because that frequency is based on Hertz, which is based on seconds, which is based on ??? IDFK (neither would they). We base everything we know on the world around us, and that’s entirely unique to earth. We make so many assumptions about how things are because we’ve only ever experienced life on this planet.

    The only thing that kind of makes sense is how many days of the year there are, because it’s based on solid science about our solar system. It’s still unique to earth, but at least it makes sense on a larger scale. Everything else? Who the hell knows. Why is a meter as long as it is? Who defined this? Why? What abstract Earth-based thing was this based on that other societies of individuals would have no point of reference to relate to?

    It’s wild we’ve made it this far, to be honest.

    Anyways, I kind of got sidetracked… I guess all I’m really trying to say is that metric makes more sense than whatever the USA is doing. Even if it’s just as abstract in its conception.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      their base numbering system would be different than ours, their symbols for numbers would be different, their entire understanding of math and how to calculate stuff could be wildly different

      The neat thing about math is it’s built upon universal truths that exist independently of how you describe them. 1+1=2 regardless of how you represent those numbers. Even among humans we have plenty of different ways of describing numbers.

      Also, the best thing about science is that physics works the way it does regardless of how you describe it. An atom of hydrogen will always have the same spectral peaks, regardless of what units you describe those peaks in.

      It’s these kinds of things we consider when trying to communicate with aliens. Take a look at:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_plaque

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_Golden_Record

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arecibo_message

      These messages will probably never be received, even if there is intelligent life out there. But if something intelligent does find these messages, they will probably determine they are artificial, and hopefully manage to decode some of it.

    • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think one useful comparison would be to convert their measurement of the speed of light to our measurement and vice versa. They will use different units of distance and time, but the values themselves will be proportional unless they live in a black hole.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That could work for velocities, but any measure of distance is based on our notion of time, like “light year” (the distance light can travel in one rotation of the Earth around the sun), which is relative.

        Even an AU is the distance from Earth to our sun.

        To be fair, we don’t really have another point of reference with which to measure stuff.

        A good way to portray distance could be a blip the length of time it would take light to travel that far. Like an RF signal that lasts as long as it would take for light up travel from one edge of an object to the other edge of the object.

        … It’s a difficult problem to try to solve even as a mental exercise.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      At first I thought that’s how Americans measure it - in San Franciscos. But given how “San Francisco” doesn’t sound like “One seven six oh” I’m not sure if they don’t.

      • antler@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        It’s not a good tip, but this is how I hear it:

        1: One

        San Fran: Seven

        Cisc: Six

        O: Oh

        I just came up with it off the cuff, but I may use it going forward. I’ve never been able to remember feet or yards in a mile.

        Also, we only measure length in bananas and fractions thereof.

  • Octavio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Fair, but I lived in Denver for 26 years. I will never forget the number of feet in a mile. 😂

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Pretty much. If you go to a Broncos game, you’re going to see a graphic saying we’re 5280 feet above sea-level at least a hundred times.

          Edit: These are just some examples that in the non-public areas of the stadium to mess with opposing teams.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            They’re right. Altitude sickness is absolutely real. I live in CT pretty close to sea level. I hiked the flatirons in Boulder and puked my guts out when I came back down.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              49 minutes ago

              The first time I ever took a non-pressurized aircraft to 10,000 feet was an interesting experience. I noticed myself breathing…not heavier, that feels like the wrong word, because I had the opposite problem to “heavy.” I needed to breathe noticeably deeper and faster just sitting still at the controls of the plane doing maybe slightly more work than typing this sentence. Somebody from a lower area going up to Denver (about half the altitude I flew to that day) to play a sport has an elevated chance of Not A Good Day.

        • Octavio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          So many businesses and shops are named 5280. Breweries, coffee shops, bars, transmission shops, interior design shops, animal hospitals, dry cleaners, bakeries…that number is plastered on signs and advertisements everywhere. 😂

  • nexguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Just remember God giving you a single grain of sand. “One thou sand”.

    Not a easy to remember as 5 tomatoes.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The only positive thing I see about imperial is that things are easily divisible by 3 and 6, but that’s about it. Then again, if doing the same with metric, you’re usually fine rounding to the nearest millimetre, and if that isn’t accurate enough, it’s probably not supposed to be done by hand anyway.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      I’ve banged on about this at length before. I prefer woodworking in inches because I have to divide by 3 and 4 a lot more often than divide by 5. It turns out that the fractional inch system evolved alongside woodworking for a very long time and it solves a lot of the problems woodworkers actually face…as long as you’re not a European scraping in the dirt for something to feel superior about.

      • chaonaut@lemmy.4d2.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Because there’s a extra system of measurement change hiding in the middle. The Inches, Feet and Yards system (with the familiar 12:1 and 3:1 ratios we know and love), and Rods, Chains, Furlongs and Miles system. Their conversation rates are generally “nice”, with ratios of 4 rods : 1 chain, 10 chains : 1 furlong, and 8 furlongs : 1 mile.

        So where do we get 5,280 with prime factors of 2^5, 3, 5 and 11? Because a chain is 22 yards long. Why? Because somewhere along the line, inches, feet and yards went to a smaller standard, and the nice round 5 yards per rods became 5 and 1/2 yards per rod. Instead of a mile containing 4,800 feet (with quarters, twelfths and hundredths of miles all being nice round numbers of feet), it contained an extra 480 feet that were 1/11th smaller than the old feet.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          The fun one is a nautical mile. Which is 6076.12 feet. How’d we get there? A nautical mile is equal to a minute of latitude, which happens to be just a bit bigger but on the order of magnitude of most “miles” to include the US statute mile.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If an alien species has 12 fingers to our 10, would they work in base 12 as normally as we use 10s? Like would their whole system end (or start) with a 0 or equivalent and not end all different?

        My maths coherence is too high-school for this thinking, but now its in there.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The Babylonian number system was base 12, that’s why there are 24 hours in a day and 60 minutes in an hour. Afaik they had the normal number of fingers, they were just smarter about making their numbering system divisible.

        • Marz157@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There’s really nothing special about base 10 numbering, it just feels natural to us. They probably would use base 12 and just have 2 extra symbols for the digits after 9. Example 10 x 10 = 100 in both base 10 and base 12 math. It’s just the translation of that in base 12 to base 10 looks like 12 × 12 = 144 to us.

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, A, B, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 1A, 1B, 20, 21, …, A0, A1, A3, …

          You can use your hands to count in base 12 if you want to, and some cultures have done so. Just use the segments on your fingers on one hand, using your thumb to count each segment.

          https://youtube.com/shorts/ThOuUa_iLnM

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s funny how the biggest argument for metric is that it’s so accurate but in real life use it degrades to “close enough”. My main problem with metric is that I can’t get my pencil that sharp.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What are you even trying to say here? Yeah, in real-life use we use “close enough”. I don’t need to know that it’s 1,546 metres to the nearest supermarket. 1.5 km is close enough.

        But nobody is suggesting it because it’s “so accurate”. Any system can be accurate, depending on how many sig figs you use. The advantage of metric is on how easy it is to convert between different scales. Use millimetres, metres, or kilometres for the appropriate case, depending on the need you have for precision. And just move the decimal point if you decide you don’t need as much precision…or need more. In archaic measurements, you can’t do that. If you’ve got 342 feet and decide you actually only need to be accurate to the chain, you have to memorise the arbitrary number of 3 feet to a yard, and 22 yards to a chain, and divide 342 by those numbers, to arrive at 5.2 chains.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s accurate when you need it to be and gets out of the way when you don’t. And if you do need the accuracy, you have a unit that doesn’t need fractions.

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        How is “accurate” an argument?? You can use any unit with any amount of decimal places. The argument is that it’s regular. You learn the prefixes once and apply them to length, volume, weight, …

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The biggest argument for metric is that it’s consistent. It takes 1 calories to heat 1k of water by 1 degree. State something similar in imperial units.

      • BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Most standard measuring tapes have 1/16th of an inch as the smallest fraction on the tape. 1mm is 1/32nd Which is one is “close enough”? Lol

        Edit: 1/32, not 1/64