Creative analogy. However, it’s not even remotely applicable.
You’re falling victim to a basic observation bias. You notice the trans people who don’t pass, but you have no idea how many trans people you see that do pass, and you’d never even consider that they’re trans.
Again, found the “but I’m not even transphobic” transphobe.
Found the awkward “I’m not transphobic” transphobe.
My teacher is female.
My teacher is a female.
The former is adjectival, the latter is an icky noun. That “a” is doing a lot of work lol.
Same goes for race. The number of times a story starts with “this black guy…” and the story has nothing to do with race is way too high. Especially from white people who just say “this guy” if the person was white. It just shows your implicit (or explicit) bias and that you think of someone differently because of the colour of their skin and you’re attempting to encode that feeling within your language.
Honestly, and the occasional shrine and came back from my house Day and was curious about the Shinto and I think I see it’s a rainy weekend but it is particularly religious and I don’t struggle to find it’s a rainy thing but it is a heaven to see you and you wouldn’t have been fun with you in line.
I mean, yeah same.
I type 120. How fucked am I, doctor?
Just because it isn’t dangerous to the average individual does not mean it isn’t a problem and something that should not be happening.
The entire point of this thread is that from an outsiders perspective, you’re only going to see the news articles and form biased opinions. You’re going to see “Oh wow, the US has a lot of school shootings, schools must be super dangerous!”, meanwhile there were 82 deaths from school shootings last year out of 49.4 million students, or 0.000165% of the student population. Even looking at injuries, we only get to 0.00054%.
Is that number too high? Fuck yes. Any number of children injured or dying due to violence is unacceptable. It’s disgusting and the lack of response from our leadership is abhorrent. But are schools in the US dangerous because of this? Absolutely not.
And keeping with their initial example, the US also has a lot of school shootings. Doesn’t mean schools are dangerous.
That’s still civil. I think this is just a case of fraud plain and simple.
Just because you scored high doesn’t mean they did. They are recruiters, after all.
Y’all realize what you’re describing is just a poor tax, right? Anyone with significantly higher income over base income would…just break the law anyway.
If we’re talking using money to deter crimes, it needs to be a sliding scale. You’re a millionaire and got a speeding ticket? That’ll be $50,000.
It is! Just be aware that it won’t always be right. It’s good to verify things with additional sources (as with anything, really).
I mean…
私と日本語で会話したいか 😅
At the end of the day, I feel like it’s how you use the tool. “if you’re just trying to work through a bunch of problems so you can stop working through a bunch of problems, it ain’t gonna help you.” How do you think a bunch of kids using this are going to be using it when it comes to school work that they’re required to finish, but not likely actually interested in?
If it is on the open internet and visible to anyone with a web browser and you have an adblocker like most people, you are not paying to support that work. That’s what it was trained on.
I personally use it’s answers as a jumping off point to do my own research, or I ask it for sources directly about things and check those out. I frequently use LLMs for learning about topics, but definitely don’t take anything they say at face value.
For a personal example, I use ChatGPT as my personal Japanese tutor. I use it discuss and break down nuances of various words or sayings, names of certain conjugation forms etc. etc., and it is absolutely not 100% correct, but I can now take the names of things that it gives me in native Japanese that I never would have known and look them up using other resources. Either it’s correct and I find confirming information, or it’s wrong and I can research further independently or ask it follow up questions. It’s certainly not as good as a human native speaker, but for $20 a month and as someone who likes enjoys doing their own research, I fucking love it.
I think this works great if the student is interested in the subject, but if you’re just trying to work through a bunch of problems so you can stop working through a bunch of problems, it ain’t gonna help you.
I have personally learned so much from LLMs (although you can’t really take anything at face value and have to look things up independently, but it gives you a great starting place), but it comes from a genuine interest in the questions I’m asking and things I dig at.
It’s the world we live in. It’s very much intentionally designed to make you complacent.
Keep being ignorant to your own biases, it will do you well in life, pompous jackass.