If you’ve been called before a Genocide hearing, you don’t have a moral army. Full stop.
Referring to any group of people who’s job it is to kill other groups of people as “moral” seems like a bit of an oxymoron to me. I get that the scale can tip really fucking far to the evil side but how close to the good side is it even possible to get?
I’m genuinely not trying to be rude with this:
referring to any group of people who’s job it is . . .
Whose* job it is
Thank you for coming to my ted talk
Who is job?
I see nothing immoral in having an army to defend your country if invaded
Maybe they were “just following orders”.
Given the soldiers that killed unarmed hostages against the order of their field commander they’re not even doing that.
Would love to see this used in future headlines. “Most moral army in the world kills civilians hiding in a church” or “Most moral army in the world bombs refugee camp” or maybe most poignantly, “Most moral army in the world convicted of genocide”
“Most moral army in the world kills white flag waving hostages they were purported to be rescuing”
Unfortunately the ICJ has no enforcement mechanism. The upshot is that the ICC does, and they’re investigating the conflict as well.
Main benefit is putting pressure on allies, especially the US, to stop sending weapons etc. Israel might not give a fuck but the US does. I think that’s why Israel is worried about the whole thing.
Canada’s PM Trudeau says that they will abide by the ruling of the ICJ case. Before they didn’t want to get the side-eye from big bro US so they mostly want along with their anti-violence but unconditionally pro-Israel stance until recently.
“Most moral army in the world?”
That doesn’t even make sense. Just going full trumpian, not only am I not guilty of what you accuse me off, I am the most opposite of that in the entire world. It’s about as believable for them as it is when Trump says it. What on earth is their strategy here? I mean rhetorical question I guess, strategy is just spewing BS it seems.
Pretty stirring indication it’s a fascist/authoritarian state…
Sure it does when you believe you literally have the backing of god
Maybe people have seen what all this fake news bullshit has done. Now you can just tell any lie you want, and anyone who says otherwise is fake or a lie.
Damn, I guess this was all just a big misunderstanding.
The most moral army in the world? Top 3 are for sure Kiwi, Costa Rican, & Swiss
Israeli wouldn’t even be in the top 150 lmao
Swiss are too busy laundering money for despots and criminals to commit war crimes
Ha, nice. I see what you did there.
For others in case they do not know:
Most moral army in the world slaughters human shields. More at 11
I think they meant morel, like the mushroom. That makes more sense
Most moral army before and during the war for real. If morals were child murder.
I bet it also has the best words. And is a stable genius too! :-P
(link)Only moral armies in the world are in Cuba, Loas, Vietnam, and China because these are the only armies that serve the people as opposed to serving an oligarchy.
Lol
lol are you kidding me?
Don’t get me wrong, I support their war (minus the fucking genocide, fucking hell) against Hamas.
But come the fuck on, you’re literally bombing kids. Cut that shit out, go to The Hague, get fucking hanged for it. In the mean time, get some people in the tunnels, kill Hamas. Then bomb some military sites in Iran and some Hezbollah shit in Lebanon, then fucking go home.
Gives them at least 3 months until Hamas 2.0, rinse, repeat, boost domestic military industry.
Then bomb some military sites in Iran
Do you want WWIII? Because that’s how you get WWIII.
No it isn’t
Mutually assured destruction doesn’t go away because of conventional warfare. Nuclear powers have attacked each other directly and indirectly since the 70s and we haven’t had ww3 yet. The most recent example is US troops killing Russians in Yemen, or the US killing suleimani via drone strike. For previous conflicts, see India vs Pakistan and also China.
The risk of global war is at an all time low because of globalization. Nobody can afford it anymore due to multinationals. We have escaped the Pax Americana and now we are in the Pax Corporata.
WWIII doesn’t need to have nukes in it.
Good point thanks
Edit: btw I’m not being sarcastic, actually good point.
There is no military solution to this conflict.
There’s a military solution to every disagreement.
They’re seldom good ideas though.
Genocide is not a solution.
I agree with that, it’s also not practical even if it was a solution.
Subjugation, however, has proved historically to be a great solution (even if temporary) to geopolitical disagreements. See: literally every war where the winners got what they wanted. WwIi, us civil war, the entirety of Mongolian history, Chinese history, wars against American Indians, Spanish conquest of South America, Ireland(sorry), etc. doesn’t always work, see Afghanistan, lots of Africa, the Incan empire’s pre-Colombian collapse, same for the Romans (well, after it worked for both), etc. but it CAN work.
deleted by creator
No one is reading whatever trash you just wrote.
Removed by mod
Nope ain’t no room for god in this holy war
Removed by mod
Least bloodthirsty lib
I recommend you read about the French conquest of Algeria. It is how it is most likely to go for Israel. I’m sure you would have supported the French too then.
