• jk1006@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I am from Germany and it is just sad how many people use these apps from shit companies without thinking, when suitable alternatives exist everywhere. Just use Firefox, it will work for 99,9% without any flaw. I would love to ditch WhatsApp, but could only convinge a few people to change to Signal. It is as easy as downloading a new app to prevent supporting Meta, but that’s too much effort for many :-(

  • Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s really annoying to me that Firefox doesn’t seem to work well on my chromebook, so I’m stuck with Chrome until I need a new computer…

  • jam_scot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I switched to Firefox many years ago, after their announcement I switched to Waterfox and I’m very happy with it.

  • knexcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

  • Pulsar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Webserial is only reason I see to install Chrome. For everything else Firefox works great.

  • Jimius@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    if ads were normal and unobtrusive. We wouldn’t need ad blockers. Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate. I had been running an ad blocker for so many years that when a friend (who doesn’t use an ad blocker) showed me a website, the unfiltered experience was horrifying.

      • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s even worse when you consider the entire point of advertising is to deliver a targeted payload at a very specific demographic. So you can target IT folks of a specific company, etc.

    • 🎨 Elaine Cortez 🇨🇦 @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I was about to comment something similar but you said it before I did. Sometimes I’ll mistakenly open YouTube with Chrome and then I realize I messed up because I have to sit through three, sometimes one-minute long ads just to watch a twenty second video. I’ll typically just nope out and switch to Firefox. The worst thing is they’re unskippable and I swear for some of them the ad actually pauses if you switch to another tab or browser. I’m getting ads even on super old videos so I’m pretty sure it isn’t all to do with the channels themselves monetizing their videos.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        3 one minute long adds are better than those 2 hour long prageru racist propaganda videos trying to masquerade as “Educational” content

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Im old enough to remember the internet before ads, and with ads became a thing and you had to make sure to keep your speakers low/off all the time less some screaming loud ad popped up somewhere to burst your eardrums at 2am.

      There were so many obnoxious, visual cancer ads.

      Then they became actual digital cancer by being injection points for viruses and malware, and thus adblockers became a necessity.

      And they remain a necessity to this day, for the same reason as they were 20+ years ago.

      and yet the ad servers want to blame the end user for adblocking.

      not their absolute refusal to moderate or police any of the content they deliver.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I went to help out a friend, a few years ago, he runs vanilla Edge, I can’t believe anyone actually uses the internet like that.

    • padge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’d be okay with sites showing me unintrusive non targeted ads, but since it’s all or nothing I choose nothing.

  • g4nd41ph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

    I’ve started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

    • karma@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If they break youtube in alternative browsers or force ads I’ll finally be able to ditch youtube for good.

    • devedeset@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Ironically YouTube seems to work better for me in firefox, although the issue in chrome may be caused by browser extensions

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The only problem I’ve had is that you can’t view HDR content in YouTube on Firefox.

        That’s not a big part of YouTube (yet), so it is largely unnoticeable.

      • ysjet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I know what he’s talking about- there was some javascript spec or something that google proposed, and nobody else bought in, so it never actually became part of javascript’s standard.

        But google implemented it into chrome’s javascript engine anyway, and then used it for youtube. There was some fallback code if the new functions weren’t available, but, because of a ‘mistake’ they didn’t work and basically made playback ass for a while until the open source community basically debugged and fixed the issue FOR google, and then spent a few weeks cramming it down google’s throat that it needed fixed.

      • g4nd41ph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It probably didn’t have anything to do with Firefox itself. It’s likely related to something I messed up in FF or it was something to do with the ancient laptop I had at the time being a junk heap, but I tried Chrome and noticed that the trouble didn’t exist there. So I started using Chrome.

        I kept using it because of all the google integration, which was really handy when I was using the google business suite to run my own small business. I shut that down two years ago now, so there’s nothing really keeping me on Chrome any more.

        I swapped back to FF a few days ago and YouTube works fine now. So I’m back on the FF train and giving Google the finger the whole way over banning the adblockers that I liked.

    • Mike_The_TV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There were a few extensions you could run in firefox that told youtube that it was totally for reals being accessed by a chrome browser.

      • g4nd41ph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Boy, that would have been good to know back in 2015, I feel like I let Google hoodwink me into using Chrome for all that time.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      And if you don’t like Firefox, use one of the Firefox forks. Some of them are very Chrome-like.

      • azalty@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They’re too strict, unless you have one that’s usable by default?

          • Abnorc@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            It’s been a while since I used it, but Librewolf had a habit of showing the bitwarden extension’s window at the wrong size.

            I was able to fix this by disabling a “resist fingerprinting” setting, but it’s annoying to have to do stuff like this in the first place. I really wanted to have an exceptions list that included certain websites for fingerprinting resistance, but I never found a clear way to do it.

            There are a few other examples of settings that I had to tweak in order to make the experience as good as Firefox.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Ah right. But none of them are true forks, really. They still rely on the Firefox project to port features in etc.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I wish I could say the same. Web dev. 🫡 But at least I’m using Chromium, if that’s even slightly better.

    • trn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Never has been 🔫 (at least for a couple of years)

    • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I only use chrome for my work stuff, and that’s because I work with g-suite a lot.

      Chrome fucking sucks

        • DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I think the Brave CEO recently said some Trumpy shit (in case you’re at all curious for the downvoting).

          • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            I wish more people were like you. Not everyone can keep up with everyone’s beefs (this one not so much) but it really grinds my gears when I see seemingly polite, on topic, engaging or contributing comments with no replies but still geyting down voted. Especially on a forum as thirsty as Lemmy users are for more user involvement.

            It makes me think there are too many people in the world conditioned to be preset to hate thst the fact a person doesn’t know they’re supposed to hate something is enough grounds to be shunned and hated on. Lol. It’s cool to see someone jump in and say:Hey homie, we don’t hate you we hate a person who is unrelated to the topic of the thread or the context of your comment but we do hate them enough to hate on you

            Edit: the parenthesis comment was meant to imply hating Trump monkeys is glaringly obvious. My comment was about lemmy etiquette and wasn’t about why or why not OP was getting downvoted.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              It’s gotta be some kind of sheep brain activation; crowd following behavior. It can be very annoying sometimes.

              Sometimes you’re just voicing a neutral opinion and it gets destroyed. And by neutral I mean it’s not controversial or anything, like racism, it could just be something not exactly everyone would agree with.

              I wish people would use the down vote as Reddit once intended it to mean: off topic and not contributing to the discussion, or perhaps rude, etc. Not “I don’t agree with this”. You should explain why you don’t agree with something, or up vote a comment that already explains it.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    And that is why I went to Firefox once Google announced this bullshit.

    Swapping is pretty painless. It even brings over all your passwords and stuff these days. Best get to swapping before Google disable that as well. They’d just love to keep you hostage.

      • zer0@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Some suggestions:

        • Bitwarden (US based but with EU hosting, free tier, open source)
        • proton-pass (Swiss based with free tier)
        • Keepass (open source system, free “self-hosted” through cloud saves)
        • 1pass (Us based, paid tiers only)
        • Lastpass (US based, free tier. Lots of breaches in the past so I can’t recommend)
  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I take this as a sign that it genuinely still works to block ads and hasn’t sold out and become malware like those others that used to be popular.

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It was removed because Google did away with manifest v2 for browser extensions, and uBlock Origin worked almost entirely from a feature provided in manifest v2. So it was removed because it can no longer work on chromium devices, unless the browser manually adds back in support for it. Firefox has chosen to continue to support manifest v2, so the original uBlock origin is still available. uBlock lite is still available in the chrome store, and uses the new manifest v3. It is more limited in it’s capability, but should be able to get the most obtrusive stuff. The lite version is definitely not nearly as powerful as the original.

      On a side note, it seems to me like the link still works for now. Idk how much longer that will last.