Summary

Special counsel Jack Smith dropped 44 federal charges against Donald Trump, citing DOJ policy that sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted.

The charges, including election interference and classified documents retention, could be refiled after Trump’s presidency.

Critics, including Rep. Dan Goldman and former Capitol officer Aquilino Gonell, decried the move as a miscarriage of justice, asserting it places Trump above the law.

Trump and allies celebrated the decision as a victory, with Vice President-elect JD Vance vowing to prevent similar prosecutions.

Democrats fear Trump will seek political retaliation, deepening national divisions.

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    204
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The United States is a fucking joke. The nation supposedly founded on the rejection of a king believes that one person is literally not subject to US law. I could not have more contempt for, or feel more shame about being an unwilling participant in the unprincipled hypocrisy of this absolute shit hole of a country.

    Fuck the oligarchs that run this place. Fuck the fascist Republican Party. Fuck the cowardly Democrats. And fuck the moronic, fear-riddled people.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is the biggest and most obvious show of the corruption of the US American “justice” system. It was long known as the best “justice” money could buy, but this is open disregard of any legal principle.

      • slampisko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well it’s still the best justice money can buy, just in a twisted, sinister kind of way and with a big emphasis on the money part

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The average lifespan of an empire is 250 years.

      The USA is 248 years old.

      These facts are unrelated and I don’t remember why I brought them up.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Strictly speaking, it makes sense that you don’t ask the DOJ to prosecute their boss, considering if DOJ threw the case, he could not be prosecuted again later due to double jeopardy.

      Instead, presidents are to be judged by Congress through impeachment, since Congress is supposed to be independent.

      Does not really change anything since congress is too broken by partisan politics to do anything, but I just wanted to point out where the issue really is.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    If only we still had another month with a Dem president and his AG controlling the DOJ…

    I mean a month is a short time, ideally we’d have had that the last four fucking years and had plenty of time to handle this.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      116
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fairly certain and it appears obvious the DOJ believes the president is totally immune.

      Part of the reason we are not members of the ICC.

      Part of the reason Dick Cheney is not in The Hague right now.

      Fairly certain United States has been a fascist country since at least 1790

      • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Every single time someone tries to hold Trump accountable he claims it is a witch hunt.

        Every single time the charges don’t stick because of intimidation or corrupt judges the public believes that it is a witch hunt just a little more and it is harder to get people to take it seriously.

        This has happened so many times now that he has been able to win an election as a felon.

        The DOJ knows that even if they successfully charge Trump now, his administration will get him out of it. Their only hope is to put it on pause and wait for an opportunity to actually hold him accountable. Because there is no way that can happen after he won an election.

        • eran_morad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          that fat fuck’ll be long dead before any justice could ever be served. justice within the legal system, that is.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 month ago

          Their only hope is to put it on pause and wait for an opportunity to actually hold him accountable.

          it’s fucking over. he won the election, and he’s going to fucking pardon himself, die, or both before anyone holds anyone accountable.

          he’s going to gut any functional part of the legal system and get no reprimand.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because there is no way that can happen after he won an election.

          “A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.”

          • Alexander Hamilton
        • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          According to what I heard on youtube from US lawyers, the statuette of limitation will run out by the time Orange Goo finishes with his current term. Leading to no trial. There is no pausing.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wouldn’t go that far back, or say we’ve been a fascist country for that long.

        I put a lot of blame on Dems closing ranks for Bill back in the 90s.

        The root of the argument is semantic: The President has testified that he did not touch Lewinsky sexually. Lewinsky’s testimony, and that of her friends and colleagues claim he did.

        But the bottom line is whether this constitutes an impeachable offense. Again, Starr’s report claims there is ample evidence of Clinton lying under oath, and concealing evidence of his relationship with Lewinsky to begin impeachment proceedings. Lawyers for Clinton declared today that the President’s transgressions were “personal,” but do not constitute an impeachable offense.

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-clinton-lie-under-oath/

        Like, people still act like trump has some mastermind legal strategy when he’s just ripping off Bill by blurring the line between president and person.

        At the end of the day for decades both parties have agreed that regardless of which one of them is in charge, no one gets any consequences from the others.

        We can’t count on those groups holding each other accountable. Voters need to hold at least one party to a higher standard, or literally no one is ever going to be held accountable.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Until we have a different electoral system there is no way to hold a party accountable without losing an election.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Pretty sure y’all just lost the election spectacularly, so might as well hold the party accountable now that the worst has already happened.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              They already think it’s cause they didn’t go far right enough. They’ve got their heads up their asses as always and won’t change as always.

              • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                30 days ago

                Yeah right? Might as well use these next 4 years, organize and rally behind a real third party no? No?

                Oh y’all voting democrats again In 4 years? Blue no matter who?

                Yeah that’s what I thought

                • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  30 days ago

                  Which third party has any seats in any state legislature? Which one has anyone in Congress or a governorship?

                  None of that will change in four years. If I quit my job and start right fucking now doing organizing - even though I don’t know what that entails other than dealing with people which I loathe - it will be a solid decade before any third party has any chance of controlling anything outside of a city council.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 month ago

            For an honest attempt at it?

            No, it’ll never be a fair fight.

            But if we want a Dem primary in 2028, we need to keep demanding it, and we need to solidify around a candidate ASAP.

            Voters beat the party in 08, and they’ve had to walk back a lot of what Hillary changed in 2016 to prevent that.

            I still feel crazy that everyone ignored what happened to NH this “primary” but I don’t think we’re really at the point where Dems just appoint candidates without a primary.

            We just need a candidate that refuses to concede until more than a handful of chosen states vote.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                Certainly the game is rigged. Don’t let that stop you; if you don’t bet you can’t win.

                As true today as in 1987 when Heinlein wrote it

    • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      How about 2.5 years in which everyone held off because they didn’t want to step on the FBI’s toes, and it turned out that they weren’t doing anything?

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This is just like Obama giving Bush and Cheney a pass for war crimes and starting a war based on complete lies.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yep. None of this is new, it’s the same song and dance.

        I’ve criticized both parties for acting like voters have the memory of goldfish, but it’s getting harder and harder to argue they’re wrong.

        People don’t remember the shit they literally lived thru already.

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re talking about a criminal case, what does a month do for you? At every turn, Trump has consistently tried to delay the process. It has nothing to do with the DOJ or AG, they are working the system to intentionally delay everything until now. Why proceed either, he’s going to be president in two months.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        He’s making a facetious point about the huge quantities of time Merrick Garland had to waste to create this outcome.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        “they are working the system to intentionally delay everything until now.”

        If only every criminal defendant could afford to do the same…

        –It would probably be a moot point because it would be legislated away as a legal strategy by the same officials that were previously dragging their feet for Trump.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      The Russia/Republican propaganda has been too strong to make anything stick. If you try to arrest Trump while he has enough followers to win an election then you’ll get a mob like Jan 6th storming whatever prison he’s held in.

      It’s not as simple as you’re trying to make it sound.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Give me a break. These charges could have been pursued on day one, in Washington DC.

        The administration sat on their hands.

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Why do you think they “sat on their hands”? Do you think they are conspiring to help Trump? Do you think your internet armchair analysis of the situation is better that the entire DOJ and they just aren’t as smart as you?

          Or is it the obvious answer that Trump has been able to get away with corruption time and time again due to Russian/republicans? And their control of our government and justice system? And the DOJ knows that if they try to prosecute Trump and the charges don’t stick that they won’t get another try.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Trust the DOJ to do their job when they just dropped their charges lol, ok. Sprinkled in some Russian/republican blame instead of a defunct system, chef’s kiss. Any other propaganda we need to spread today?

              • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I never said I blamed them, you’re just painting a weird conspiracy theory where the DOJ are the heroes/victims but “the rest of the goberment is controlled by RuSsIA AnD rEpuBliCans!!!” It’s been apparent for everyone, the rich gets a different justice system. The system has been defunct for a long time and was on full display for the last election. This is easy lay-up policy and legislation, make politicians responsible and accountable while defending democracy. You get crickets from any incumbent, everyone is very comfortable with how the system currently works (if you’re a politician).

                edit: forgot to comment on the link,

                Trump’s attorneys had asked to have until Nov. 21, instead of Nov. 7, to file an up-to-180-page brief arguing why Trump’s efforts to overturn President Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory

                They asked for a 2 week extension, whether it’s bullshit or not that’s a pretty typical standard request from a legal team. It was more erroneous to imagine the actual court date going through when it was expected.

                • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Trust the DOJ to do their job when they just dropped their charges lol, ok.

                  You imply the DOJ can’t be trusted to do their job because they dropped the charges. How is that not blaming the DOJ?

                  It’s no conspiracy theory that Russia has bot farms that push their narratives to change public opinion. Hell we have communities here on lemmy that have earned a reputation for doing that from all onlookers.

      • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sounds to me like a perfect recipe to round up and arrest a bunch of traitors to American principles. Was the thought trump would just shut up and quietly go away if we kept biding time or he lost another election. What, if anything, about trumps character would make anyone think that. 100% the government just dropped the ball on this. They won with trump in the opposition and wanted to time it well enough to win again and have him divide and weaken the republicans.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    sitting presidents cannot be prosecuted.

    The charges, including election interference

    🤡

    Election interference is legal if you do it so well you win.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      In fairness, that’s election interference over the last election. It just took a whole cycle to conclude that he definitely did do it. There’s no way he did it this time though right? Right?

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        No one could possibly be that daring that they’d do it and win, lose, then do it again to win again?

        Second time must have been legit.

  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wow I’m so shocked

    Had 4 years to sort this and out the fucker in jail for treason and decided to dick around doing fuck all til a few months before the election.

    Biden has the blood of 100,000 on his hands and the death of democracy in his lap. That’s his legacy.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Personally, I think the administration dragged its heels because it was stupid enough to want to run against Trump again. After all, if they had the bogeyman incarnate to run against, they could move to the right and still be second worst. And second worst wins elections, right?

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Agreed. They still think being not trump is the easiest way to power since single identity politics is losing its charm.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            30 days ago

            That and:

            "I mean if push comes to shove we can help a small very specific subsect of you guys, after all the rest of you are doing exactly as well as our corporate donors want you to be and that probably means pretty good, we don’t think about it very much and figure your complaints are just people being needy.

            But I mean what could the orange man even offer, he acts like there is something wrong too. He’s wrong and bad! Let’s stay the same, updoots in the center!"

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              29 days ago

              Can’t forget Harris pledging to close the border and build the wall, tax breaks for small businesses and worthy plebs (home-buyers who’d payed rent on time for 3 years), or create “the most lethal military in history”.

              • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                29 days ago

                First generational home buyers who lived in a corporate owned apartment complex and paid on time for the last 2 years.

                Like literally only for immigrants who had been imported in and proven to be helpful to the economy.

                And the business loans were the same way but only for black men who had already been running the business for 3 years in specific industries who has already received a pell grant. So like 5 people they likely new and wanted to give money to directly without giving it directly.

                Hyper specific to help the least amount of people and then murderous war machine to finish anyone else off outside of that.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 month ago

    Democrats fear Trump will seek political retaliation, deepening national divisions.

    No, it’s not a fear. It’s an acknowledgement of exactly what he has said he will do:

    Trump has said repeatedly he will seek political retaliation, deepening national divisions.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      This feels like a joke from Portal

      “Test subjects fear I will kill them with turrets and fry whatever is left, even if it’s still alive. Mostly because of my plans to kill them with turrets and fry whatever is left even if it’s still alive.” - GlaDOS probably

  • aarRJaay@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 month ago

    English person here: I didn’t think he was classed as ‘sitting’ until he was officially voted in with the Electoral College and sworn in. Surely there’s still time to prosecute.

    • Dupree878@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re right that he’s not sitting yet, but wrong in that there’s not time to prosecute before he is sworn in. And anyway, he’d be the boss of the prosecutors against him so he can retaliate with no fear of consequence.

  • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    I told my wife 4 years ago when these charges came in “If this becomes more than a slap on the wrist I will be amazed”, I am not amazed.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I’m actually kinda OK with this considering the circumstances.

    With the republican’s capture of the presidency, congress, and the SCOTUS, there’s no way he’s going to suffer a day for his charges if the court pursued them.

    The main problem was not sentencing him quickly when they had the chance. That’s the major fuckup.

    Anyway, the dismissed charges are without prejudice. Which offers the opportunity (assuming trump survives his presidency, we don’t end up with a de facto republican dictatorship, etc) that he can be sentenced after his presidency.

    But we all know how the courts love sentencing rich old white dudes.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      I see it as a white flag. It’s not gonna happen now, and it isn’t going to happen later either. This battle they lost and that’s that.

      Democrats need to start worrying less about Trump the person and more about the potential ramifications we will face in the near and farther future. It seems Democrats have a 5 year plan and Republicans have a 50 year plan, that’s why they keep gaining power and favor.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      How so. Legally he can’t take office according to the constitution. And thereby his charges in Georgia and NY would hit him still, as Vance couldn’t pardon state charges. But yeah, we knew this would happen

  • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Went from oligarchy to patriarchal oligarchy reaaal quick there lmao

    Everyone’s going to shrug it off like they did in russia when putin was beginning to spread his roots. Then they’ll cry 'it’s not the people’s fault, it’s him!".

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yup. Jack’s hands were tied by SCOTUS.

      It is good that he didn’t dismiss the charges with prejudice tho 'cause that means they can be brought again.

      • Denidil@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        29 days ago

        Dropping them now actually prevents a Trump Admin appointee from getting them dismissed with prejudice. it sucks that trumps delay tactics let him run out the clock, and it’s unclear of Garland was malicious or incompetent in how long he delayed appointing Smith. Hopefully we come out the other side.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      You know, for the first time in my life I understand the Cultists from Lovecraftian horror. If there was some ritual we could perform to awaken an Elder God to devour the planet, I would be about ready to join in.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lot of good that decrying’ll do now.

    Democrats are done, elect a progressive party

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Merrick Garland needs to be remembered by history as an all time coward. The way we use Machiavelli to label a traitor, we need to use Garland to denote the most limp, failed and feckless human being.

    Here’s everything you need, press this one button and the majority of the country will celebrate you perpetually and history will call you a hero… Doesn’t lift a finger, throws up down the front of his shirt, falls asleep.

    Fuck Merrick Garland, without qualification.

    • Ellen_musk_ox@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      29 days ago

      The blame is squarely at the feet of McConnell, Obama, Biden, Orrin Hatch, and finally Merrick Garland.

      A timeline:

      In 2010 Obama nominated Kagan to SCOTUS. A nomination criticized by Hatch as blatantly partisan. Hatch said that he had known Garland for years. He added that, if nominated, he would be a “consensus nominee” and that there was “no question” he would be confirmed.

      Then in 2016 with the Scalia vacancy, McConnell made up the fictional “Biden rule” to refuse seating or even hearing a nominee. Hatch then claimed that this process could proceed if an uncontroversial nominee was proffered. He again mentioned Merrick Garland:

      "The president told me several times he’s going to name a moderate [to fill the court vacancy], but I don’t believe him. [Obama] could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man. He probably won’t do that because this appointment is about the election. So I’m pretty sure he’ll name someone the [liberal Democratic base] wants.”

      Then of course, Obama caved to Hatch’s public request further elevating Garland in the public eye and to the approval of centrists and liberals. McConnell still refused to acquiesce, and dragged it out into the next presidency.

      Then with Trump’s electoral win, and some backroom dealing to get Kennedy to retire, the federalist society and the heritage foundation got their 40+ year wish. A conservative court, despite the rules, the circumstances, the math being otherwise. And all with zero fight from the Obama Administration.

      Fast forward to the Biden administration in 2021, FOREVER still entertaining the notions of bipartisanship. Even while the GOP will offer a handshake while donning a Freddy Kruegeresque sharpened gauntlet of knives.

      So of COURSE Biden nominated Garland to AG in the foolish hope that Americans and the GOP would somehow view this move as apolitical, above the frey, etc.

      Garland is a symptom just like Trump is a symptom. They both stem from the same problem. That problem being a new aristocracy, a political class that seeks to simply preserve their places in power, and completely purge the citizenry from the body politic. A new Jim Crow, but one of bureaucracy. One that exclusively values the opinions of the political class over the wishes of the people. Garland is the example of this system as is Obama/Biden and many others. Meanwhile men like McConnell will easily exploit this system, and men like Trump will gain power as a reaction TO this system.

      Power has been removed from the people (what little we had) and now the GOP and the majority of the DNC seek to keep it that way as it keeps them in power.

      If you think I’m wrong about the DNC, just look at their actions. They’re floating Rahm Emanuel to head the DNC. They’re already talking about a Harris/Buttigieg ticket in 2028 (because you know, fuck the voters, their primaries, their caucuses. Who needs a Democratic process?)

      And it’s not a nobody saying this. It’s guys like David Axlerod saying it on the LibDem mouthpiece network MSNBC.