• bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s not strictly true. In the US there is in most states NO requirements for paid leave outside of a few protected types. But not vacation or sick. And we also are largely not unionized. We still have time off albeit MUCH less than Europeans and such.

      Though I’d argue the norm of having any paid time off is a byproduct of labor/union battles in the past.

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        We’re given just enough scraps to avoid mass unionization. That’s because the last time it happened we got The New Deal. This time it’ll be the Economic Bill of Rights. The leftist platform hasn’t changed for 80 years.

        • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Would be nice if there were more voices calling for democracy in the workplace. That would change so many things and make concentration of wealth and political corruption much more difficult.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        How the fuck is sick leave not protected. Y’all Americans need to be rioting over that shit. That’s wild

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d say you earned them as part of the agreed compensation in exchange for your work. That way you also cover circumstances where there’s no union, and no government requirement, but the employer still offers PTO to be competitive with other employers. Which theoretically could also be driven by other people’s unions or governments, but then that would be indirect.

      Besides which, regardless of how the arrangement came to be, you earned your PTO.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not calling you out specifically, but I see this phrase everywhere and don’t understand its popularity. It would be more concise and equally “clever” to just say “Sounds like this guy works in the US”. What is the appeal that everyone keeps typing this?

      • arandomthought@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        AFAIK it’s been a challenge some people did on… twitter I think?
        Basically it’s “Tell me you’re XYZ without telling me you’re XYZ” and people responded with funny answers.
        At some point that got turned around and people satrted to use that sencence structure to indicate that the thing they are commenting on would have been a great answer for that challenge.

        • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thanks yeah, I’ve seen that sort of thread. If anything in this particular case it would make more sense if the comment was “tell me what country you’re from without telling me what country you’re from.”

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It may be coming from those popular AskReddit threads, such as: Tell me what you do for a living without telling what you do for a living.

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s a colloquialism of Internet denizens that I’ve seen floating around for many years. In fact it’s somewhat baffling to me that you haven’t seen it until now.

          • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Right, my bad. I guess I’m hinting at your comment needing a bit of a massage until it says what you mean. My suspicion is you actually just don’t like the turn of phrase, not that you don’t get why it’s used, right? Which is perfectly fine yo.

            Hell, the way you phrased not liking something as "not getting it’ and yor statement just now with the “?” At the end of it are both standard interwebby colloquialisms.

            Not fighting, just saying

            • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well like other people were saying, there’s a trend of people posting this prompt, and then others responding with funny answers. You’re right, I don’t like it when people use the same formulation in response to a comment. I also don’t get why people are doing it, for the same reason: I don’t think it’s funny, and it doesn’t really add anything to the conversation.

              Usually memes are funny because there’s a familiar pattern and then people riff on the pattern and make little unexpected tweaks. The type of usage I don’t like and don’t get is when people are just saying “you’re this” in a more wordy way. It has the form of a joke with no punchline.

              • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I get what you’re saying bout the repetitiveness of the way people communicate. Someone it can feel like a bunch of LLMs slapping together the same 10-15 lines together to mimic speech.

                I attemt to say things in different ways and have a “voice” you can hear to fight this repetitiveness, and out of sheer boredom towards the ways things are commonly said. THAT said I’m “guilty” of using memespeech too, and if course it can be clever shorthand to convey feeling if used properly.

                Dunno where I’m going with this but i do feel ya.

      • Noxy@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why did you type out “what is” when “what’s” is shorter and as clear?

        and did you really need that “just” in there?

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    My current boss is by far the best one I’ve ever had.

    It’s me.

    I’ve also got a great employee. That’s me as well.

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wouldn’t know. My office moves on 4 wheels and is full of tools. She’s the one pulling the pranks on me and they’re never good - just expensive.

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Same. Technically I report to someone at the company I contract with but mostly that’s just to let them know when I’ll be in and when I won’t.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve heard from friends who are self employed that this is a double edged sword. When you have an employer and take vacation, it feels like you’ve earned it and are taking time off at the expense of your employer. But when you’re self employed it feels like you’re just not getting paid.

      One of my friends didn’t take any time off for something like 5 years before realizing how incredibly bad that was for him.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve got 9 weeks of vacation saved up, and I must take it you say?

    Ok, I’ll see you in 9 weeks!

    What do you mean, 9 week is too long to be gone? Make up your mind!

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my younger days I witnessed this conversation

      Guy was basically Brent (if you know you know) for a huge project. So on the 2st of Dec our boss phoned him and said he had 4 weeks to take before jan 1st. Brent’s responce was cool see you next year and was told no I can’t let you do that

      We just looked at eacother in total amused confusion

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Was it me? Because I had that conversation back in '10 or '11. I ended up taking most of it off then took off the rest after the project “off the books” (but with an email paper trail because I’ve been burned before).

          • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sadly I did not. I have visited but I was only there a few weeks to have beer and bratwurst.

            I’m starting to think that there are a lot of managers who demand the impossible.

  • Lighttrails@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I get 5 sick days a year. I can roll over sick days, allowing up to 13 sick days a year. If I use more that 2 in a row, I need a doctors note. If I use 5 sick days in a row I forfeit my bonus pay for that month. Fuck me right?

  • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll never understand this. I regularly encourage my staff to use their PTO and only deny requests if multiple people want overlapping days. Even then, if we can rearrange the schedule to make it work, we will.

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the way

      I go so far as to get all involved parties together and discuss to see who has the greatest need. I also make a point of trying to make the person who doesn’t get have as easy a time as possible on their next request.

      It would supprise you how often the reason for the holiday is meh got to use em before the end of the year

  • m3t00🌎 voted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Government job I had gave 10 sick days a year. Use or lose. I’d do extended weekends. Boss said he’d noticed a pattern of me calling in sick on Fridays. Well duh. Started alternating Mondays. He gave up.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    With the US is it the vacation rules are mostly not required. Many states have different rules, and the more conservative the state, the more anti worker the rules are.

    And all the jobs I’ve worked, I’ve never seen any pushback for taking vacation. But that’s because I work in a white collar industry that is competitive and I can find another job if I wanted to. The less skilled you are, and the lower the opportunities are in the industries around you, the more opportunity exists for shitty employers.

    The interesting thing is, that I currently work for a Scottish company, and their vacation rules are worse than mine because I am guided by California labor laws, and they’re under shitty UK labor laws.

      • blady_blah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The main difference from a vacation standpoint is that the vacation days are allocated per calendar year, and must all be used in that calendar year. You’re given x amount on January 1st and they must all be used by December 31st.

        In California, vacation days are treated as an accruing asset. They can’t reset my vacation days at the turnover of a calendar year . The vacation hours build up over time. This means there’s not an end of the year rush to use vacation days, there is no use it or lose it, and if I’m ever laid off the company has to pay me for all the vacation days I’ve accrued. The California system is a much better system than the one the employees have in Scotland.

        • Apollo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think that may be a company policy rather than a legal policy. I work for a scottish company in scotland where I am a union rep. My holiday year follows the financial year (april 1 - march 31st) and secondly I do not lose holiday hours that I don’t take - that would be wage theft. In theory I can rollover holidays indefinitely but if I worked for a company that did not allow this, the company in question would effectively have to buy any unspent holiday hours from me. There is no use it or lose it, theres use it for time off or be paid for it.

          Out of curioisity how many holiday days do you get per year?

          • blady_blah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s absolutely a company policy, but in California it’s not legal to have a policy like that. The whole idea that you must use all your holidays every calendar year is stupid. Having a policy where if you haven’t used all your vacation days by December 31st, you lose it, is stupid.

            • Apollo42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              That would be stupid I agree, but also not how it works in the UK or California either - according to CAs labour law website, the law there regarding holiday/vacation accrual is no different than the UK:

              “California law does not permit “use it or lose it” vacation policies. Vacation accruals may be capped, but may not be forfeited. Therefore, unused, accrued vacation must be paid out at the end of employment”

              Since you didn’t answer my last question I looked it up, California has no legal minimum number of vacation days? That’s grim as fuck and completely shoots down your “California labour laws are better than UK” where the legal minimum number of vacation days is 28 per year.

              I say minimum because almost no employer here offers the minimum (who would want to work for someone offering 4 weeks of holiday when other employers offer 5 or 6? Shit man last year I ended up with slightly more than 7 weeks off.

              Since I was looking into it, I noticed a number of ways that California labour laws are inferior to the ones I enjoy:

              • theres no minimim number of hours before I am legally entitled to overtime, anything over my contracted 35 hours is paid as overtime (and any overtime is completely voluntary)
              • 28 weeks of paid sick leave
              • no “at will” employment, I cannot be terminated for no reason

              I’m sure there are more but I’ve seen enough now to convince me that the labour laws in CA are hugely inferior to those in the UK.

              • blady_blah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The US tends to suck for many things worker related, I wasn’t arguing about all the different policies. However, I double checked, all our Scottish employees have a “use it or lose it” rule on vacation days. They must use all their vacation days per calendar year. They get their vacation days on Jan 1st and if they don’t use them by Dec 31st, they lose them. This is also the model the other employees have in the US, with the exception of the two of use who live in California where that type of policy is illegal.

                Since you must know, I get 20 days of vacation a year plus all federal holidays (11 days). I don’t get sick days, they come out of my vacation days. However I’m a high value employee and you’re comparing me against the blue collar workers in Scotland. I believe they get either 15 or 20 vacation days per year and I don’t really know about their sick day program. I hate the calendar “use it or lose it” vacation day plan and I think the California rules are much better.