• dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    32 minutes ago

    This is why the web is way better than any app store, yes even with the problems of DNS (DIDs becoming more prevalent cant come fast enough though). Any future phones should have a first class web experience imo.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Does anyone remember how the Devs from there didnt want to release for Android because ApPlE iS sOoOo mUcH mOoOrE sEcUrE

    Get rekt.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In terms of security alone, iPhones easily beat most Android phones. Which may be a fair argument in favor of iPhones. However, to ignore Apple’s policies and long history of delisting similar apps is delusional.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        In regards to security, Apple does have three upsides, and only those:

        • No sideloading and no unlocked bootloader means you can’t sideload malware or install malware-preloaded ROMs. No root also means you can’t just install malware that uses root access.
        • Long OS support means fewer people run around with iPhones that are 5 OS versions behind.
        • There’s no tiny boutique iPhone manufacturers who sell phones that come pre-loaded with malware.

        The solution for the first one is “don’t sideload untrusted stuff” and the solution to the second and third one is “buy an Android phone from a trusted manufacturer that has long term OS support”.

        • liuther9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          Long os support meant to intentionally brick your iphone so you buy new. That is 100% true as I had many apple products started degrading after upgrade and still have old models that are not upgraded and work perfectly

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 minutes ago

            I’m not defending apple here. Short OS support (or none at all) is not a good thing, and it’s something that’s sadly still quite common if you buy the wrong Android brand.

            Samsung is doing pretty well in that regard right now.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Based on most smartphones being very insecure. Of course, iPhones aren’t extremely secure, but the competition is practically nonexistent. Pretty much the only secure Android phones are Pixels. Samsung is considered one of the more secure manufacturers too, but according to GrapheneOS devs it’s still way behind Google.

          Note that even police and government agencies sometimes have trouble getting into iPhones. They never have such troubles getting into Android smartphones, except Pixels.

          This is by no means meant to advertise iPhones. It’s just a simple observation that security in smartphones is heavily lacking.

          • Potatar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            Dude give one example so we can google and have our own opinion. You are just saying “because they said so/because someone considered it so”.

  • RandomlyGeneratedName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This shouldn’t be on the app store. It gives the US government too much access to pull data from it, or order it pulled down. This should be a web app hosted outside the US that can be accessed by any device and can be obscured by VPN access so the regime can’t persecute participants. Apps pull way too much data from phones that ICE can subpoena.

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Fuck Apple but honestly this app is like trying to stay warm with matches in Antarctica.

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m gonna play devils advocate here (and probably be monstrously downvoted);

    ICEBlock stored the location data of all its users on Apples iCloud Servers. This the perfect target for ICE; a complete database of locations of every person who doesn’t want ICE to know where they are.

    One assumption is that that Apple realised how tempting this data is to the current demonstrative administration and purged it before ICE could get their civil-liberty-abusing mitts on it.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Alternate take: Tim is a businessman doing what’s best for Apple and he personally might not support Trump, but we will likely never know.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Tim Apple is a billionaire, doing billionaire things. Supporting the people who give him the most power and not giving a fuck about anyone else.

        • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Same take my friend. I agree - Tim’s personal politics are kinda irrelevant in this context. Best for apple=compliance with whoever is in charge so they get to keep their money printer. Corpos gonna corpo

        • fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Oh, so you’re trying to say that Tim is so greedy that he doesn’t have values at all, other than his greed? That’s an interesting position, but I think it makes him sound even worse than the previous one.

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It’s an inherent byproduct of capitalism.

            If you rise to Tim Cook’s level you must be someone that is either willing to put your personal values aside or you do not have them to begin with. The growth of the company matters more and if you prioritize your values you will be filtered the moment you misalign with whatever prevents maximal growth.

            Capitalism does not care about values, ethics, morals, social wellness, or anything besides growth. It is cancerous and leads to a toxic society that poisons itself and falls apart, which is literally happening

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You don’t succesfully run big corporations by having high moral standarts, this was never an argument. Argument was about what makes businessman a good business man, and one major thing is seizing opportunities and “playing” important people like Trump. I don’t think he’s anywhere as (morally) bad as Steve Jobs was, but he’s doing his job as expected.

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        It’s certainly not altruism, but devil’s advocate: avoidance has been their go-to tactic in working around court-ordered law enforcement cooperation. If they can make it so they don’t have access to the requested data, then they can throw their hands up when subpoenas come and avoid taking sides.

        Again, I don’t think it’s altruism. The legal and technical infrastructure required for law enforcement cooperation is an expensive, high-liability mess, and now they have the added risk of a fledgling privacy brand.

        It’s not implausible they would delete an app hosting sensitive user data as soon as they suspect they may be forced to hand it over. In fact, what’s more weird to me is that they let it stay up until an official DoJ request.

        Edit: nice

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Something worth noting, if you are using iCloud, advanced data protection is your friend. Apple doesn’t have the encryption keys, you do.

      This is not on by default.

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Advanced Data Protection does require all iCloud Ecosystem devices to be current.

        Not every person can afford the latest and greatest.

    • brem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Money is always the answer with these “people”.

      To assume otherwise is to feed the beast

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Good thing I got revenge though on Google’s sideloading ban by buying a phone that never allowed it to begin with”

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      We should make webapps for everything. When done properly they are as fast as native apps, can work on any device and do not require a dev license or account.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Who could have seen this coming from the company whose CEO gifted Trump a literal gold plaque in celebration of his reelection?

  • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You see why Google attempting to lock down installing whatever apps you want is a bad idea? This is an example of what will happen.

  • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    556
    ·
    12 hours ago

    And this is why having 3rd party app stores is important. It’s why it matters that Google is killing side loading, if two fucking companies get to decide what you can do on your phone, we’re in a bad spot technology wise

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        We rapidly need to switch to Linux Mobile. PostmarketOS and Mobian are the two most promising projects, and I would highly recommend anyone reading this to donate to them if you have the means.

        Both projects directly use your donations to hire developers to build and polish the critical essentials to get this alternative viable as a daily driver.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          While I full heartily agree with you, I’m pessimistic you will ever reach enough people with these alternatives. Even on privacy forums you hear people fervently defending how banking apps are mandatory. Those will never run on anything that isn’t locked down. The eID proposal for the EU is also dependent on Android and iOS.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            how banking apps are mandatory.

            This i don’t get, i’d rather use home-banking from my home PC.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Yes but you can’t motherfucker, don’t you understand that? In most of the world you have to use the app, you CANNOT use online banking without the bank’s app on your phone, you have no sign-in details apart from the email and the bank app, it is the only way to sign in and you sign in via 2FA inside their app and authorize transactions exclusively via that, and no you can’t use Google authenticator or whatever, it’s a “tap to allow sign on” type 2FA and the only kind supported.

              There is no “home banking”, and you are not even allowed to enter a physical bank location on the high street without being intercepted by a ghoul telling you to use the app or fuck off, you cannot call the bank because they have no public number, you do everything via the app or you cannot do anything at all.

              That’s why even people without access to drinking water have the latest fucking smartphones, they’re a prerequisite and there are no alternatives.

              Most of the time you don’t even have a bank card, just the bank card details in the bank app on your phone that are automatically added to Google Pay, and you use that because near everything is cashless and NFC.

              Soon across EU and UK your very ID will be stored on your phone.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                54 minutes ago

                I’m glad i don’t live in those parts of the world and the only mom i fuck is yours, she says hi.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It doesn’t necessarily need to achieve mass adoption, it just needs to get to a ‘good enough’ point to make it viable for those who are willing or desperate to get away from big tech.

            Linux still has plenty of people giving reasons why they won’t switch, but it’s now finally viable for many, including myself. I just want mobile Linux to get to that point too, even if there’s still rough edges.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And the open source movement is such a blind spot to the ‘left’ as well, even though technology freedom is critical if you want to be able to organise any type of resistance in the digital space.

        Lemmy users largely get it, obviously, but centre left people will happily let themselves get locked into the Apple/Google walled gardens even though you’re just giving that company a ridiculous amount of power over you.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Right? The collective dismissal of Mastodon from leftist influencers when the Muskening happened was eye opening.

          Like, there’s a collaborative, volunteer-based platform right over there. You want mutual aid? Open-source is as mutual-aid as it gets.

          But it’s nerd shit.

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Yeah it’s unhinged, FOSS is as communism in practice as it gets right now and the left just ignores it, dismissing it as “tech bad” because they can only think in AnPrim brainrot terms most of the time and judge only by aesthetics and make sweeping generalisations about social media that lack any and all imagination.

          • SOULFLY98@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Because they are controlled opposition.

            The only time something not controlled got popular was TikTok and you saw how quickly both parties went to ban it in 2024 after normal people started talking about Gaza genocide in every day conversation. The American Congress worked together to ban it even though they couldn’t agree on anything else.

            It went from an Asian platform where Asian people in the West connected with each other outside the mainstream blue pill/red pill false choice and shared culture as well as history that isn’t taught, to “here’s the truth about Jesus” and “the world is flat debate me” after that vote. Now it’s full on MAGA.

            Mastodon is harder to control because servers can pop up organically, but I guess Threads was a hedge against that threat.

          • shrugs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Also, on xitter are all these assholes I don’t care about. I can’t leave that platform. Pathetic!

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I originally got introduced to sociallist idiology through Richard Stallman’s speaches. I know he had some, uhh… “interesting” things to say about Epstein’s victims (which I believe he has since redacted), but his speaches are absolutely still worth listening to just for the content alone.

        • shrugs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          People will never understand intricacies like that. On the other hand, the big tech corps do. We are doomed

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            56 minutes ago

            Yeah. And to think, it’s a fairly small amount of nuance - it’s very basic and intuitive and information about it is literally everywhere. We are hopeless when it comes to far more complex and nuanced social issues we face like rehabilitation or ethnocentrism or trans athletes or the what have you.

            People seem to think socialism and any progress is like “be nice to each other” or some stupid aestheticism about “empathy”.

            There’s basically no way to have a conversation with them most of the time, they are so far gone and their fully formed thoughts seem more like inaccurate shorthands, it’s like trying to explain astrodynamics to a dog when it’s actively trying not to understand them.

            Normies are the death of us all.

        • shrugs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Most people dont have values because they have values. They hold a perspective just to talk down on others.

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No doubt. I’ve gotten to the point where I have like 6 apps on my phone and it’s in lockdown mode on iOS. And I’d be on grapheneOS if I wasn’t required to use iOS for work.

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          56
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Can you have your job pay for an iPhone while you have a different personal phone? I’m a big fan of keeping a work device that’s separate from a personal device.

          • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            49
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I probably could, but I’m also a recovering drug addict and my partner is pretty hesitant about a second device as it’s another way to hide things. However I’m the head of the MDM team so I’m not really nervous about what the company can see

            • fascicle@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              43
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I thought you were head of the MDMA team for a second and thought that could be rough as a recovering drug addict

                • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  20
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  Oddly I’ve only tried MDMA a few times and it never really worked. There’s some anecdotal evidence that it doesn’t work for those with bipolar which I do have, that might be the one drug I could be in charge of with no temptation actually

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, people should have listened to the people warning of privacy concerns with online services. Now that your data is valuable, companies will do anything to extract it from you.

        Stop using those products, de-Google, install Linux, use self-hosted solutions.

        It will take some effort to switch. You get to decide how much effort you’re willing to expend in order to not sacrifice all of your privacy and control of your digital lives.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Oh yeah, of course, but it feels like it’s never part of the conversation, even among people whose opinions I respect and are, for example, super critical of AI and talking about enshittification and other issues in the online sphere, they never seem to take the step to check out Linux, or get off Twitter or whatever.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      113
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      “Sideloading” is their term, invented to make it sound like something it is not. We should not use this word. The correct word is “installing”.

      You don’t “sideload” on Windows when you install software outside of the Microsoft Store™️. There is no real difference or distinction with software on phones, so there is no need for a special word.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I can see Microsoft moving to the same sort of thinking as well. Apple already made Mac OS users jump through hoops when you want to install something from the internet or even through a third party package manager like homebrew.

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Not to defend it, but the first time I encountered the term was when BlackBerry released their Playbook tablet. It ran their bbos10 and they created an android emulator so you could run some android apps. The process of installing the apk into the emulator was called sideloading.

        I miss BlackBerry is all I really wanted to say.

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        “Install” includes installing from an app store no matter how closed down and exlusive. The correct term would be “install from other sources than an app store” which is just clunky. Calling it “sideloading” won’t change that nor will calling it “your mom”. Considering how many corporate-speak terms are in use and how many braindead abbreviations and terms shortened to a word’s last syllable -completely distorting the original meaning- generally are in use, the term “sideloading” is pretty irrelevant. Either lose your mind listening to the bullshit people permanently are emitting or just live with it…

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          the term “sideloading” is pretty irrelevant.

          No, it’s not.
          “Installing” is innocuous and easily understandable (by those tech-illiterate dumbfucks that get spoonfed FUD by lobbyists); whereas sideloading is eerily similar to sidestepping and is prone to being interpreted as “working around a safeguard”.

          Words are not irrelevant.

    • kender242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      “Hurd OS? Isn’t that obsolete?” “Not obsolete. Just… illegal.” ~Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If people were more aware of how to make and install mobile web apps it would be less of a problem.

      At least on the iPhone you can still add a site to your screen that can behave a lot like an app, including camera access, location services, and even gyro. And it’s just a website like most “apps” are.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Honestly, this thing should just been a PWA. Making this naive app was dumb.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Google is not killing sideloading. If the dev is willing to submit to Apple for verification, they’d probably not object to submitting it to Google.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Google is not killing sideloading. If the dev is willing to submit

        I see…

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes, and then they ban that developer and their apps. It doesn’t matter you can install apps outside of the Play Store, if Google still controls which apps you are allowed to install.

  • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t understand why society accepted that the hardware maker gets to decide what software you run.

    That’d be like your car deciding which roads you can take, or your blender deciding you’re not allowed to use strawberries in your smoothie.

    Are you nuts? Why the fuck would your phone decide which apps you can run?

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’d be like your car deciding which roads you can take,

      It’s a feature for the next release, don’t worry.

      • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Apple welding their phones to their own store, exclusively, is just like paying workers with scrip instead of dollars. This used to be a common practice for capitalists. The scrip is spendable only in the company store.

        We have to stop all such anticompetitive practices.

        Just a reminder, to stop the practice of getting paid in scrip the American workers had to take up arms and shoot some people. Look up Battle of Blair Mountain. It’s not like the capitalists stopped the practice just because it was unpopular, lol. Nor did the anticompetitive practice of paying wages in scrip stop because people called their senators and wrote angry letters.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is it that non tech people have a hard time understanding this? Or is it just all the corporate lobbying bribes?

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Keep on buying, y’all. Show 'em we mean business when we’re appalled at their actions. Giving them more money will surely let them know how much we want change!

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Oh we are way passed the point where “voting with your dollar” means literally anything. These billionaires are making more money than they ever have in human history. They have literally turned all of society across large swaths of the world into a gigantic personal capital generator. It makes literally not a single difference if all of us here boycotted them or not. It’s meaningless.

      • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It makes literally not a single difference if all of us here boycotted them or not. It’s meaningless.

        Just lemmy users? Sure, but you don’t stop with just lemmy users.

        These billionaires are making more money than they ever have in human history

        Honest to god do you think that money magically appears in their pocket. We can still claw it back. Unionize, boycott, collective action is our strongest pressure against them and IT DOES WORK.

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          collective action is our strongest pressure against them

          Which is why governments fight so much to make it hard.
          In my neck of the woods it’s not cool to unionize and there’s no home owners’ association, people only rally for their favorite sports team but don’t bother voting.

          I guess we get what we deserve.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          A big problem is that people need smartphones for so much of modern life. You can stop watching Disney and your life won’t meaningfully change but it’s really hard to avoid evil smartphone companies. Part of me wants to switch from Apple but what would I go to? Samsung who’s just as bad about right to repair? Google who’s Google? I’m not saying it’s impossible but I’m not going to say that the choice is as easy as cancelling a streaming service.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            A big problem is that people need smartphones for so much of modern life.

            Do you though? They’re convenient, for sure, but you can also use a dumbphone and a laptop.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              53 minutes ago

              How the fuck would I access my bank then? All banks literally require their apps to access the account or sometimes even open the account, nevermind actually pay for anything or get a debit or credit card.

              >Inb4 some American downvotes because they forget the rest of the world exists

              We get it, Americans use cash in America, and they use magnetic stripe cards and cheques and all these other technologies that were phased out in rest of the world before I was even born, but that’s not really an argument to make on a global platform.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                54 minutes ago

                All banks literally require

                In your part of the world…

                • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  52 minutes ago

                  In most of the world that isn’t 1 country that starts with ‘United States’ and ends with ‘of America’

          • the_q@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yeah this is generally the take I hear the most. The smartphone is presented as a necessity and for a lot of people that may be true, but what it really is is a tool for capitalism. It spies on you, gives you fomo, serves you ads, gives access to all kinds of addictive content… oh and work apps!

            It’s like AI, shoved down our throats until people think it’s needed. It’s not.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Yeah except I do actually need one for work, paying rent, paying bills etc. It’s a helluva position of privilege to be able to say no to something like that, and that’s coming from someone who doesn’t have a car, which is far less necessary.

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              I would say you’re missing some nuance in these arguments, though.

              With a phone people no longer need laptops or full-sized computers and they also get a phone and camera to go along with it. They get a lot of power even just using fairly mundane apps like email, file storage, and a calendar. And then you have access to the internet and all the power that comes with that. I also don’t know why you think phones show ads.

              AI, on the other hand, is hot fucking garbage at everything it does. Why anyone uses it I can’t say, it’s so bad and it’s known that it’s actively making people dumber. I don’t touch the stuff and my life has been going just fine.

        • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          they would have been perfectly fine it was simply that the optics were bad enough to warrant a response

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Do you really think this situation is comparable in any way to Jimmy Kimmel? I really don’t. Even if it were, nowhere near that many Apple customers care whether or not the app that targets fascist militias is on the app store or not.

          • the_q@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I do think it’s comparable. All of this is about money. Americans are funding all of this crap with the, albeit controlled, choices we make with our money. Our taxes are funding genocides and coups and war and destruction; our purchasing habits are funding the decline of our planet and our social structures and our sanity.

            You’re right though, consumers will likely never change in large enough quantities to make a real difference. People are already resubbing to Hulu so…

            • 0x0@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Americans are funding all of this crap with the, albeit controlled, choices we make with our money.

              To an extent, yes, but the dollar has been decoupled from gold a long time ago, they can literally just print money in the billions and they do (although there days it’s probably money++ on a mainframe), completely sidestepping tax money…

            • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Jimmy Kimmel made Disney a lot of money. They had to choose between pressure from the US government, and losing a popular source of revenue along with the vast amount of liberals who swore them off. Jimmy Kimmel was not a real institutional threat to the US government. So the US government did not have a very strong incentive to continuously push for him being taken down, and Disney had a lot of incentive to keep him around.

              An app that targets fascists makes Apple no money. The US government faces the loss (or rendering ineffective) of their fascist police force. Both sides therefore face a huge amount of pressure to have the app taken down. It would have to be a gigantic part of their profit margin to warrant any pushback from Apple. I’d be very, very surprised to hear that this change is ever overturned through a boycott.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Every time I hear people talk like that I begin to think they dont understand basic microeconomics.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yes, as opposed to spending money at another capitalist institution that will inevitably do the same thing, which is somehow not a subservient take.

          There are a lot of other ways to apply pressure besides boycotts. I dont think a boycott would ever work against Apple over this.

      • ThunderQueen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Im sure thats why disney quickly reversed gear with cancelling kimmel after loosing 3.8B overnight

    • hr_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Between Apple walled garden and the new dev signature thing from Google, those big players sure do like control over what we can do as users.

      I agree with you, PWA is the way but Apple has been slow walking integration for years now (see https://brainhub.eu/library/pwa-on-ios)

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Except PWAs are heavily limited on apple devices so Apple could get that 30% cut.

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Got a source for that?

        I’m a dev and have a bunch of PWAs on my iPhone. You can install them right from the browser using that same old “add to Home Screen” behavior that has been in iOS for an eternity.

        I’m posting this through voyager for Lemmy, installed from my browser, not the App Store.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          You’re a dev and use PWAs on ios and don’t know that you can’t even get push notifications? There’s no web bluetooth, no web nfc, no background sync, 50-100mb storage limit, no background processes, no service workers. These are all standard features that apple refuses to implement for some reason. Wonder why.