• the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Keep on buying, y’all. Show 'em we mean business when we’re appalled at their actions. Giving them more money will surely let them know how much we want change!

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Oh we are way passed the point where “voting with your dollar” means literally anything. These billionaires are making more money than they ever have in human history. They have literally turned all of society across large swaths of the world into a gigantic personal capital generator. It makes literally not a single difference if all of us here boycotted them or not. It’s meaningless.

      • ILoveUnions@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It makes literally not a single difference if all of us here boycotted them or not. It’s meaningless.

        Just lemmy users? Sure, but you don’t stop with just lemmy users.

        These billionaires are making more money than they ever have in human history

        Honest to god do you think that money magically appears in their pocket. We can still claw it back. Unionize, boycott, collective action is our strongest pressure against them and IT DOES WORK.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I agree that collective action is our strongest pressure against them and it does work.

          I do not think a boycott itself is likely to reverse Apple’s removal of the app. I also think it makes more sense for the app to become available from a web browser, or some other avenue that circumvents the need for Apple’s approval in the first place.

          I also believe that collective action in this circumstance is better spent on ICE itself, which would be more effective (its the reason the US government wants Apple to remove the app in the first place) and more direct to fascist power.

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          collective action is our strongest pressure against them

          Which is why governments fight so much to make it hard.
          In my neck of the woods it’s not cool to unionize and there’s no home owners’ association, people only rally for their favorite sports team but don’t bother voting.

          I guess we get what we deserve.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 hours ago

          A big problem is that people need smartphones for so much of modern life. You can stop watching Disney and your life won’t meaningfully change but it’s really hard to avoid evil smartphone companies. Part of me wants to switch from Apple but what would I go to? Samsung who’s just as bad about right to repair? Google who’s Google? I’m not saying it’s impossible but I’m not going to say that the choice is as easy as cancelling a streaming service.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            A big problem is that people need smartphones for so much of modern life.

            Do you though? They’re convenient, for sure, but you can also use a dumbphone and a laptop.

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Yea, just gunna carry my laptop around with me everywhere. And that’s not even talking about all the nonsense on laptops that most people can’t deal with.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              How the fuck would I access my bank then? All banks literally require their apps to access the account or sometimes even open the account, nevermind actually pay for anything or get a debit or credit card.

              >Inb4 some American downvotes because they forget the rest of the world exists

              We get it, Americans use cash in America, and they use magnetic stripe cards and cheques and all these other technologies that were phased out in rest of the world before I was even born, but that’s not really an argument to make on a global platform.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                All banks literally require

                In your part of the world…

                • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  In most of the world that isn’t 1 country that starts with ‘United States’ and ends with ‘of America’

          • the_q@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah this is generally the take I hear the most. The smartphone is presented as a necessity and for a lot of people that may be true, but what it really is is a tool for capitalism. It spies on you, gives you fomo, serves you ads, gives access to all kinds of addictive content… oh and work apps!

            It’s like AI, shoved down our throats until people think it’s needed. It’s not.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Yeah except I do actually need one for work, paying rent, paying bills etc. It’s a helluva position of privilege to be able to say no to something like that, and that’s coming from someone who doesn’t have a car, which is far less necessary.

              • the_q@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                43 minutes ago

                You can’t do those things any other way, eh? That’s crazy…

                It’s a privilege to say no, eh? Interesting take.

            • Soup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              I would say you’re missing some nuance in these arguments, though.

              With a phone people no longer need laptops or full-sized computers and they also get a phone and camera to go along with it. They get a lot of power even just using fairly mundane apps like email, file storage, and a calendar. And then you have access to the internet and all the power that comes with that. I also don’t know why you think phones show ads.

              AI, on the other hand, is hot fucking garbage at everything it does. Why anyone uses it I can’t say, it’s so bad and it’s known that it’s actively making people dumber. I don’t touch the stuff and my life has been going just fine.

        • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          they would have been perfectly fine it was simply that the optics were bad enough to warrant a response

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Do you really think this situation is comparable in any way to Jimmy Kimmel? I really don’t. Even if it were, nowhere near that many Apple customers care whether or not the app that targets fascist militias is on the app store or not.

          • the_q@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I do think it’s comparable. All of this is about money. Americans are funding all of this crap with the, albeit controlled, choices we make with our money. Our taxes are funding genocides and coups and war and destruction; our purchasing habits are funding the decline of our planet and our social structures and our sanity.

            You’re right though, consumers will likely never change in large enough quantities to make a real difference. People are already resubbing to Hulu so…

            • 0x0@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Americans are funding all of this crap with the, albeit controlled, choices we make with our money.

              To an extent, yes, but the dollar has been decoupled from gold a long time ago, they can literally just print money in the billions and they do (although there days it’s probably money++ on a mainframe), completely sidestepping tax money…

            • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              Jimmy Kimmel made Disney a lot of money. They had to choose between pressure from the US government, and losing a popular source of revenue along with the vast amount of liberals who swore them off. Jimmy Kimmel was not a real institutional threat to the US government. So the US government did not have a very strong incentive to continuously push for him being taken down, and Disney had a lot of incentive to keep him around.

              An app that targets fascists makes Apple no money. The US government faces the loss (or rendering ineffective) of their fascist police force. Both sides therefore face a huge amount of pressure to have the app taken down. It would have to be a gigantic part of their profit margin to warrant any pushback from Apple. I’d be very, very surprised to hear that this change is ever overturned through a boycott.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Every time I hear people talk like that I begin to think they dont understand basic microeconomics.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yes, as opposed to spending money at another capitalist institution that will inevitably do the same thing, which is somehow not a subservient take.

          There are a lot of other ways to apply pressure besides boycotts. I dont think a boycott would ever work against Apple over this.

      • ThunderQueen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Im sure thats why disney quickly reversed gear with cancelling kimmel after loosing 3.8B overnight