• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    In case people are missing the joke the reason is so that they can’t find you to bill you.

    This doesn’t actually work quite like this, but it’s a funny joke none the less.

    Especially if you’ve been to that hospital before. And if you have any medical records anywhere.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Oh, I was about to comment something like “wtf did you kill a doctor or something?”

      That makes more sense.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If you have medical records, do they keep a DNA record of you?

      If you don’t keep a record of yourself and don’t have any ID on yourself when you call, if you don’t give a name can they match your DNA or something?

      • lilith267@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Theoretically this is possible to do if you’ve avoided any documentation your entire life, or more likely, the hospital staff just dont care enough and forget to find out who you really are before letting you leave.

        But realistically the hospital is going to have the cops come in and do a background check on you before even letting you get further care after lifesaving measures. And if you dont give up your information then your most likely getting ICE called on your ass…

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          10 hours ago

          none of that is going to happen. hospitals in america are required to provide care in emergencies, no matter if you have documentation or not. you’re not getting ICE called (no hospital is going to do that) and no cops are going to come in to do a background check (what would they check? you don’t have any ID, you’re not required to provide an ID, there’s no crime being committed).

          • lilith267@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            hospitals in america are required to provide care in emergencies

            Yes thats why I stated anything further then life saving procedures

            Your not getting ICE called

            While not called, ICE has arrested/deported hospital patients

            you’re not required to privide an ID

            Yes you are? At the very least you must provide contact information and who you are. Hospitals are looking to make money off of you lol, not paying is a crime

            And when I slammed into a mountainside in my car the hospital I stayed at was very pissed I couldn’t remember my phone number (I just got a new one) and ran an entire background check on me

            The only thing hospitals aren’t gonna do is share your medical information with 3rd parties due to HIPPA, they themselves are still gonna collect it tho

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            That assumes a person isn’t a Hispanic day laborer at a hospital during an ICE raid. ICE seems to be focusing on places of work for their targets, but with the current pause on the federal judge’s ruling, ICE can violate the fourth amendment anywhere.

            ICE doesn’t need any ID to look at a person and make a judgement based on physical appearance.

            https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/09/supreme-court-allows-federal-officers-to-more-freely-make-immigration-stops-in-los-angeles/

            In her dissent, Sotomayor argued that the Trump administration, “and now the concurrence” by Kavanaugh, “has all but declared that all Latinos, U.S. citizens or not, who work low wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time, taken away from work, and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents’ satisfaction.”

            In Sotomayor’s view, the Trump administration had not shown that it was ultimately likely to prevail on the merits. In particular, she wrote, “a set of facts cannot constitute reasonable suspicion if it ‘describes a very large category of presumably innocent’ people.” “Allowing the seizure,” she said, “of any Latino speaking Spanish at a car wash in Los Angles tramples the constitutional requirement that officers ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’”