• killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The country is riddled with leaky mains pipes because water companies are more concerned with allocating huge bonuses to themselves than they are with fixing infrastructure.

    Now we’re courting tech companies to build more data centres that our other shitty infrastructure (electric) isn’t even fit to support because magic money tree go brrrrrrr

    This is mandated recycling 2.0. Fill supermarkets with products 99% of which come in plastic wrappers, only successfully recover a fraction of that, and then tell the consumer they’re the ones destroying the environment.

    If they can fit my 5 recycling boxes up their rear, then they can shove this up their arse too.

  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    A small data center has been estimated to use upwards of 25 million liters of water per year if it relies on old-school cooling methods that allow water to evaporate.

    So pass a law banning evaporative cooling systems from all industrial and commercial applications (or single out data centers), give them 6 months to comply and start handing out fines every day past the deadline.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      straight up not feasible for many serious and necessary facilities like powerplants and refineries, unless you prefer very warm lake or river nearby (which also cools down by evaporation later)

      • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        straight up not feasible

        It’s very feasible to create the law, collect the fine, and raise the price on energy sources or industrial process that require the cooling.

        It’s a formality, you could do it in an afternoon. Costs a bit of ink and a piece of paper.

        “But then it gets more expensive!” and “This might push corporations out of the city/country.” is the consequence the people / the government / the country have to have the balls to endure, if they want to stand by things like “having enough water” or “living on earth in the 22nd century”.

        If the free market is something you believe in, you should love this, because it makes water a more scarce resource and the market will be able to find another optimal solution to that new scarcity problem.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Show me how do you want to dissipate 10GWt inland without evaporative cooling towers, i’ll wait

          • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            21 hours ago

            summitsystems.co.uk/adiabatic-coolers-vs-cooling-towers/

            There are many solutions to this problem. Evaporative cooling is just the cheapest. But it’s only cheap because we don’t charge these water users market rates for water. If they’re threatening drinking water or agricultural water we should just charge them for water usage the same as you pay for drinking water at home. That’s fundamentally what they’re taking when they drain the rivers dry. That way they compete directly on the water market instead of bypassing it.

            They’ll install adiabatic coolers in no time.

          • scratchee@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            If evaporative cooling is the only solution then the market will adjust to the new cost by moving power generation towards the coasts or just increase the price, if there are other solutions they’ll become the economically more viable. Either way more water is conserved and you can always balance the cost benefit by adjusting the fine/tax to find a good balance.

            • nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              best recent example is the evolution of plastic free straws… took 3 years to innovate, would have never ever happened without the pressure.

              and dann the first versions of soggy paper sucked so hard.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Depending on local climate, season and proximity to cities or industrial customers, this is often done, but you’ll still have to dump lots of heat in the summer when space heating is off

    • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      cool. and watch the entire right wing go mad over “net zero wokery” and “stealth taxes choking our economy to death.” then watch reform win with a landslide and bulldoze the entire net zero agenda and see where we end up.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The right will always complain no matter what you do, so why bother listening to them and capitulating?

        • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          sensibly managing the economy and balancing the need to achieve reduced emissions with the need to maintain a functional economy is not capitulating, and indeed being seen to carefully maintain that balance might be key to election victory in four years time.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    I never heard so much bs in a single article. Those files and emails are stored on cold storage, and is using zero water. I guess it’s a good thing to remove old files and empty your trash bin, both in real life as well as digital.

    But this article makes no sense at all. Just one query to an AI will use so much more energy and water in comparison with your old email in cold storage. It’s a joke.

    Ps. By removing your files now, and checking the contents, you are actually moving the files from cold storage to hot. Meaning the server will load the data into memory etc. Which will actually makes this drought worse, not better.

    • shrugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nice analogy. I used this one in the past: “you can’t fix a full disk by deleting word documents”, but I like yours more

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          To be fair, those automated air pumps require upkeep (e.g. compressors fail after awhile and aren’t always super cheap to replace when factoring the cost of the part and labor to fix). So that’s what your money was paying for, not the air itself. But, I agree it is a bit ridiculous.

          As a side note, I highly recommend those portable air compressors that can plug into your car’s aux port. Super convenient in the winter time when your tires’ air pressure drops.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m not sure how is this applicable?

        If you have storage for documents, they will fill it up and you have to remove them.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I hope the Department that released this guidance is being absolutely pilloried in UK media. What an absolutely worthless, dishonest pile of crap.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    How is deleting locally-stored files on your home PC going to save water, when your hardware sips resources vs. any AI datacenter in existence?

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ll also wear blue clothing to have the same impact

    Well, deleting stuff causes a load of processing that wouldn’t have otherwise happened… So I guess I should have some coal barbecues?

  • hisao@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So where does this water go after evaporating or leaking from your toilet? Is it flying into deep space and being lost for our planet forever?

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Raining over the ocean where it is no longer in the stores of freshwater these systems are pulling from

      • hisao@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        So this doesn’t sound like a big deal after all. Maybe just stop pulling water from those “stores of freshwater” for cooling purposes and get your own from the ocean.

          • hisao@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, let them figure it out. It’s their problem after all. If it’s more expensive, then let them increase prices for their “data serving” activities. If it’s too expensive for some people, they might reconsider their usage of said services which in turn might be equivalent of “deleting old files or emails”. Instead of asking people deleting files right now before those in charge even tried to fix the problems they created.

          • hisao@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Lol, sorry, I meant that for them, not for you. Should have written ‘maybe they should just stop pulling water from those “stores of freshwater” for cooling purposes and get their own from the ocean’.