Pennomi

Yeah, you need 38 states to ratify it. If we go by governors (so I don’t have to do a ton of research, but it’s probably representative of legislatures), only 27 states are Republican controlled. Good fucking luck getting a partisan amendment through.

Constitutional amendments also have to be ratified by the states. That’s not trivial.

It’s in the constitution. It’ll take a lot more than that.

The USA became dominant by letting the world fight itself to ruins, then entering into the war late and declaring victory. TWICE.

Being the only mostly undestroyed nation after a world war is immensely profitable.

It’s certainly true. Trump’s also close with Musk these days, and Musk certainly will pressure him to allow Grok to vacuum up all the data for free.

I mean, the rules would allow everybody to get around copyright in this way. A rule like that would apply to all the indie LORA trainers as well.

I don’t think this will make much difference honestly, we already have very little regulation here. It probably means that there will be copyright exemptions for training models. And honestly eroding copyright bit by bit is okay in my book.

What we should be worried about are the human rights that are about to be violated.

We can still try to obstruct via filibuster and other mechanisms. (Republicans have already shown us how to do it effectively.) But certainly no progress can be made for the next four years.

Nah, Russia could barely handle a Ukraine with heavy restrictions on how they could use weapons.

Poland could kick Russia’s ass.

Only one candidate said they want to be a dictator if elected, and (spoiler alert) it wasn’t Kamala.

It’s not an exemption for one person if you say that a felony related to undermining an election stops you from being able to vote. I think that’s fair enough.

The problem is that a judge, by virtue of being human, is incapable of impartiality.

If there were some sort of computer code that turned the legal system into a hard science that would be amazing, but I doubt that’s even possible.

This is a particularly difficult situation to give advice on because it could be totally harmless or completely dangerous, depending on the details.

You’re probably best talking to a therapist or other highly trusted individual who knows the specifics of the situation instead of random internet strangers.

There’s no way they will sentence a sitting president.

It’s not hard to max out when doing simulations in Blender, but I know I have a niche use case.

The problem with this is always cost. That looks just as expensive to fire, if not moreso, than the drone it shoots down.

Me too. High five! (But not like, in person. Because I’m not leaving my house.)

Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.

The hard part is that “direct” is subjective and up to interpretation of the court.

I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.

But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.