• Malgas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Better to read the short story collection it’s allegedly based on. Yet another case of a movie studio paying for the rights to something beloved so that they can slap the title on something generic and unrelated.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Honestly you could make an argument against my previous comment saying that the clanker in the original saying “can you?” is just a dumb LLM repeating snarky reddit comments from its training data. Then the accurate reaction would really be “omg what a fucking dumb piece of trash”. In the movie this robot was actually truly intelligent tho iirc. Been a long time since i watched it.

        • Poik@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          The book was better, and completely unrelated. The movie is fun, but kind of a dumb action flick. It ignores most of the nuance Asimov would have had to make a movie you don’t have to think about. There’s nothing wrong with that, I just don’t prefer that, unless it’s what I signed up for, like with John Wick or something else obviously just action.