• mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Turbo tax made 1.6 BILLION in income. And that’s not enough. They need to lobby and change the landscape of the countries tax system to generate even more profit on top of the profit they already made.

    This isn’t capitalism anymore this is something else entirely. It’s a metal disorder. A disease.

    https://www.propublica.org/article/turbotax-and-others-charged-at-least-14-million-americans-for-tax-prep-that-should-have-been-free-audit-finds#%3A~%3Atext=The+company's+TurboTax+unit+generated%2CSterling+Auty%2C+who+covers+Intuit.

  • rippermonty@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s called bribery in my country. It’s disgusting anr very prevalent here but at least we don’t embellish the idea with polite terminology 😂

  • rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The rich pay what they want while the workers must pay what the rich want.

  • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    your political system is already based on legalized bribery and this is where you draw the line? lmao. Lobbying has destroyed america for a century.

  • Wanpieserino@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Then stop accepting wealth in your country. You accumulate the capital of the whole world inside your country and then expect them to be there for any other reason than to control the policy there?

    Make it make sense

  • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Intuit has been doing this for a long time, just in case anyone was wondering why $1 million seems like a low bribe. And it goes beyond preventing you from filing your taxes for free, with one of their goals being to make it as much of a pain in the ass as possible, so you are too frustrated to do it yourself.

    This if from a 2019 Pro Publica article:

    But the success of TurboTax rests on a shaky foundation, one that could collapse overnight if the U.S. government did what most wealthy countries did long ago and made tax filing simple and free for most citizens.

    For more than 20 years, Intuit has waged a sophisticated, sometimes covert war to prevent the government from doing just that, according to internal company and IRS documents and interviews with insiders. The company unleashed a battalion of lobbyists and hired top officials from the agency that regulates it. From the beginning, Intuit recognized that its success depended on two parallel missions: stoking innovation in Silicon Valley while stifling it in Washington. Indeed, employees ruefully joke that the company’s motto should actually be “compromise without integrity.”

    Internal presentations lay out company tactics for fighting “encroachment,” Intuit’s catchall term for any government initiative to make filing taxes easier — such as creating a free government filing system or pre-filling people’s returns with payroll or other data the IRS already has. “For a decade proposals have sought to create IRS tax software or a ReturnFree Tax System; All were stopped,” reads a confidential 2007 PowerPoint presentation from an Intuit board of directors meeting. The company’s 2014-15 plan included manufacturing “3rd-party grass roots” support. “Buy ads for op-eds/editorials/stories in African American and Latino media,” one internal PowerPoint slide states.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s a little late now, but don’t forget that FreeTaxUSA is free for federal and cheap for state. Also much less annoying to use than Intuit TurboTax. They don’t do those fake loading animations like “checking the best deal!” As if a computer can’t do like a billion of those a second.

    • celeryfc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      MyFreeTaxes.org has been what I’ve used. Sponsored by United Way and EzPz. Only catch is that it only works up to a certain income level, but free state and federal filing as long as you’re under the threshold.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If I had to guess, this is a holdover from the 90s where people didn’t trust a quick calculation, and probably doubted the application was properly choosing the standard or itemized deductions.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    wait you guys have to pay to file taxes???

    do they actually want you to evade taxes??

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No. You can file your taxes for free. And, if you ever pay to file your taxes, you’re not paying the government, you’re paying for tax preparation software or for a tax professional to do your taxes for you.

      But! Even if your tax situation is very simple, filing your taxes on your own is difficult. In Europe, the government sends you a form with what they think you owe based on all the information they have on you. If you agree with the calculation, you just send the form back and either pay or receive a refund.

      In the US your employer gives you some sheets of paper with some values on it. Your bank gives you some different forms. And so-on. When it’s tax time, you gather up all that paper, hope you have it all, try to remember what forms you need and if you have them, and then painstakingly try to copy the right values from the W-2, 1099-INT, and so on into the right boxes on form 1040, 1040 Schedule 1, 1040 Schedule 2, 1040 Schedule H, 1095-A, and so on. Then, you try to do the calculations where it says to multiply the value from 1040 row 43 by the correct value in table A9. A9 has different values depending on how many dependants you have, and if you’re filing jointly or alone.

      Basically, it’s doable on your own, especially if you have a fairly standard / simple tax situation. But, it’s easy to make a mistake along the way. If you ever need an explanation about what you’re supposed to do, that information exists, but it’s in accountanteze, and it often refers to about 5 other IRS publications that just complicate things further. And, when you’re dealing with thousands of dollars, a mistake could be really costly. So, most people buy a copy of TurboTax every year for $30, which somehow turns into $60 by the time you’re actually ready to file because the $30 version only covers people in situation X, and since you have Y you need to upgrade.

      TurboTax then takes $1 out of the $60 you paid them, and goes to Washington with that to lobby politicians to keep the tax code complicated so that people need to buy a new TurboTax every year. (Oh yeah, and things change just enough that every year you need to buy the latest software to file your taxes.)

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Australia prefills all the information from employers, banks, share market registers so most people can log onto the government website, go to their tax account and accept the prefilled form

    • jaaake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The tax system is so complicated, most people can’t handle navigating it on their own. Most people have jobs where taxes are automatically removed from pay checks and sent to both state and federal tax agencies. However, that amount is just an estimate and once a year (or quarter) you need to file paperwork to confirm whether you over or underpaid and then you either get a rebate (without interest), or you’ll need to send in a payment to make up the difference. That paperwork has been lobbied to remain as complicated as possible so that companies like Intuit can provide services that tax payers find useful and continue to pay for. This is more complicated for business owners, both big and small.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Well, in my opinion this will be a good platform for American progressives to run on: make taxes less complicated by getting rid of middle men.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            There is nothing wrong with lobbying…. There are lobbies for woman’s rights, black rights, all sorts of good causes have lobbies.

            The politicians just bend over for corporate lobbies. Very important distinction. I think what would fit your argument better is will never happen as long as citizens United exists.

            • serenissi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Any paid lobbying is bribery. Legislators should raise people’s opinion who voted them in and act as representative, not say what others pay them to say.

              I can’t believe it is legal in so many countries. Apparently though it seems more problematic in the US but European countries aren’t immune either.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                When we were legalizing cannabis in Maine the local growers had to form a lobby to fight against the out of state corporate growers who also had a powerful lobby. Banning lobbying doesn’t help it just takes away peoples voices. Lobbying is just a group of people pooling resources to enact common legislation or political goals. It’s an important part of the political process people neglect. and it’s been diluted by money. Don’t need to dilute it further with misinformation.

                • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  and it’s been diluted by money

                  That’s why they said “any paid lobbying is bribery”. While anyone can sign a petition to your representative and that’s technically also lobbying, what we’re talking about here is not that. In a democracy, every person gets their voice heard. With lobbying, only the dollar speaks.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I mean someone has to pay the lobbiests. The National Organization for women pays lawyers to write laws for them to present to congress, through lobbiests who are also paid. You want feminist groups who are allowed to write feminist laws and present them to congress right? You want someone to advocate for laws you want right? That’s lobbying?

                Citizens united is what you guys are thinking of. The one where corporations can donate infinite money to politicians? So when a corporate lobby brings anti-feminist legislation, they then contribute lots of money to the politician they are lobbying. And magically the politican ignores their voters and sides with the anti-feminist pro corporate law. That’s citizens united. It’s not a problem with lobbying. You have a problem with corporate lobbys not womans rights lobbys right? You have a problem with your representatives favoring corporate lobbys because they get infinite money throught… DRUM ROLL… Citizens united.

                I really hope this helps.

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            There needs to be more citizen lobbying. What really needs to happen is citizens organizing, pooling their money, and hiring lobbyists, just like big corporations do.

            • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              A look at the Forbes Fortune500 should point out why that’s basically impossible.

              Just looking at the top one, Walmart, not even considering anyone else on this list, their raw profit in 2024 after all expenses and payrolls and everything was

              $15,511,000,000.00

              Amazon in the #2 spot made almost double that. Remember this isn’t revenue, this is profit, this is extra money after all normal expenses are paid.

              If I pulled together every single person I’ve ever met in my life, regardless of their opinion of me, and we all donated all the money we had ever made in our lives, we might approach a tenth of Walmart’s 2024 profits.

              The wealth inequality gap in America is large enough that it is actually difficult to wrap your head around. The difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars is about a billion dollars - to be exact, you’ll need 999 million more dollars to reach it after you have your first million in the bank. Fighting corporate money with citizens’ money is not only wasteful but impossible.

    • scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I mean, yes, because if they catch you evading taxes then they get a free slave for the term of your incarceration. To them it’s a win-win.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      No they just want us to do our part by both paying taxes to the government and paying corporations that pay the government. All makes sense in a tidy corporofascisit system.

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah I figured the Canadian system we have was as bad as the US’s but apparently not. Having to pay to file is wild

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No, and no. It is typically more convenient to pay to file taxes though. These companies hand hold you through the process and often have some protection for you if you get audited.

      That said, this still means the government needs to make things easier for everyone. You shouldn’t feel like you need help to just file a standard tax return if all you do is have a regular job, no investments, and no deductions. Which is something like half of the US.

  • TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    18 hours ago

    A million dollars is all it takes to buy whatever laws you want? That’s a really good deal for Intuit.

    • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Remember all those (exactly) 1 million dollar “donations” all those CEOs were giving to Trump’s inaugural campaign? Those weren’t donations, they were bribes and kissing of the ring. Pledge loyalty (and pay a small fee) and the government will work for you.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Except if you’re Google or Facebook. Trump will accept your money and still fuck you over. Why anyone trusts him is beyond me.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          They don’t trust him, but they don’t want to get on his bad side. They’re basically hoping that he’ll ignore them or forget about them, and focus his attention on his other enemies.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Politicians are cheap, I remember once seeing a list of how much a lobbyist buys support from politicians for and the list was like $5k $2k $3k $6k. It’s ridiculous

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s much more complicated than that though. The lobbying firms hire people who are former politicians or former senior staffers who have all kinds of contacts all over Washington. Getting those guys on the payroll is extremely expensive.

        Then, those lobbyists generally don’t just go off and bribe someone. They build and strengthen relationships. They know all the pain points that the politicians have, and they just make things easier. If a politician’s staffer is having trouble finding a good place to live in DC, the lobbyist knows a guy who knows a guy who can get them a great apartment.

        Eventually, the lobbyist isn’t this guy who tries to get the politician to change some laws. He’s basically part of the team. So, when new legislation comes up, the whole team works on it together, including the lobbyist.

        The end result is that the $5k or whatever is only the direct contribution to the politician’s re-election campaign or something. Most of the spending is hiring the lobbyist and paying all his/her various expenses that make them indispensable for the politician, so that they can step in at the right time.

  • SolidShake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    is there a fact check on this? seems wild to me. wonder what the maga cult defense is on this one.

  • Kurious84@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Anyone else starting to think since Trump likes Putin maybe he too would like to gather all of the nations wealth for himself and his leeches. Seems like they’ll get all the money and kick backs and business and we’re left with even less, causing us to work more and get less.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s entirely the point of all those tariffs. Raise taxes on everybody without calling it that.