EU absolutely is a country.

  • Antaeus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Danish person here.

    Yes. Ban Google, Meta, X and all the rest. Let’s use a bit of EU funds to fund a privacy respecting social media that is NOT controlled by the US or China.

  • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Not really. I think the whole internet should be accessible to everyone.

    Do I think Americans are often obnoxious online? Yes.

    Do I know for a fact their big tech corporations are equally as evil as the Chinese ones, no matter how much their propaganda tries to convince me China is worse? Definitely.

    Is Xwitter a blight on society that only got worse since an out-and-out fascist bought it? Of course it is.

    But closing ourselves off from the world is not the solution.

    What I would support would be stricter regulations on data collection and algorithmic manipulation, because those things are bad no matter who is doing it.

    I would support heavier tariffs on foreign big tech, because if they’re going to use our people as a resource, they should at least pay up so we can put that money towards taking care of our own.

    And I would support a government program to incentivise home-grown technological solutions, because digital sovereingty is a concern, and the only solution is having our own shit.

  • DeLacue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I am a big proponent of free speech and the merits of free access to information.

    Or at least I was. I’ve always known that bad actors with control over your information input can do an awful lot of damage. I used to think free and open access was the best choice. But seeing how a few companies captured the entire social media environment and have swollen to near-total monopolies and then how those same companies have shown themselves to be bad actors with malicious intent I have changed my opinion. Banning them would help slow down the flow of info sewage into the EU and encourage more competing companies to form. We need that since the EU can’t break up American companies. So if new companies were ever to be competitive we need to remove the giants from the pool and commit to breaking up any that get too big.

  • Ozzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’m definitely on board with ban of popular social media (from any country) that tracks me and collects my data even when I’m in toilet, let alone my search history on a day to day basis and sells it to others to generate it’s revenue and shoves its own agenda as the result on my feed. I want something like 4chan but a little more mature in terms of audience and no modspreading like on Reddit.

    Basically, Lemmy is good. Nice middle ground. Reddit like approach to content that I wanna view with other like-minded people whilst not being pushed off from the dinner table just because I wanna eat something else. Besides Reddit and fediverse, not many platforms allow that unless you completely start over with your algorithm.

    I wanna be able to see and be part of whatever I chose to ignore after I feel like eating that said food tomorrow, or the week after or the next year. If any social platform provides that, to the entire world, then they should be supported no matter what. Sadly platforms like Lemmy are not that popular even though they offer almost exactly what I just asked for.

  • Saryn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I didn’t use to, and I am generally against limiting access to any sort of source of information. But the last few years have convinced me otherwise - the owners of these platforms are willing to destroy our way of life for their own personal benefit. Fuck Zuck. Fuck Musk. Fuck all of these charlatans and conmen.

    Edit: oh, and the EU isn’t a country (yet), it’s a supranational organization which presents unique challenges in terms of policy. Def not a country

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Considering they’re being actively and without denial used to fuck us over, yes. I’m not going to play the censorship card. The US is now no better than Russia, there’s no reason we should treat them better. US platforms are now literally an offensive weapon, Musk already started riots over fake news and is directly and openly meddling in our politics. This shit needs to stop. Just like we blocked RT news, this needs to go.

    It’s in the same vein like Trump threatening military action against Greenland. Trump is literally committing extortion under the treat of war. The US is an actively hostile nation that targets everyone including their own allies. Like what the actual fuck? How did we get here? We need to decouple from the US as soon as possible. I’d go as far as compare the US to a ravid animal on the international stage, I’m absolutely mortified by what’s going on.

  • Comalnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I probably still wouldnt support banning any specific social media, or social media from a specific country. What needs to happen is some fucking regulation for algorithms, moderation, hate speech and misinformation. And then you can ban any social media that doesnt comply

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I heard there is talk of a projects for the EU to increase its digital sovereignty. Now would be a great time for those projects to come to fruition.

    As for me, if this means that there’ll be an EU-wide reboot of Hyves, I’d be thrilled. Extra so if, on the back-end, it works on a Federated system.

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Depends. Not all of them are bad. Take pinterest for instance, it’s harmless. And youtube is too valuable to lose. But X? Yes, X should go.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m all for free speech but when it’s heavily skewed and unfairly moderated I support a ban. Facebook, Instagram, Reddit and Xitter should just be removed.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    At least anything that has anything to do with Trump or Muskyboi, yes.

  • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I can’t really get away from a ‘benevolent dictator’ mindset on this, I support good things and don’t support bad things. Good and bad being defined be me alone. X and Meta feel like bad things to me so away they go. So the following feels like post hoc justification of the above, right?

    I oppose oligarchy, X and Meta are products of oligarchs and as such wouldn’t oppose their ban.

    • Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      A more objective, or at least utilitarian justification is that oligarchy reduces total welfare by overconsuming limited resources for the benefit of the few. Propaganda for such inequity is unethical and should be banned.