• A Roman dodecahedron, a mysterious 12-sided metal object, was discovered in the village of Norton Disney in England.
  • The artifact is in excellent condition and is larger than many other dodecahedrons that have been found.
  • The purpose of these objects remains unclear, but theories suggest they may have been used for ritualistic or religious purposes.
  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ancient Romans be like: “haha, they don’t know how to use the three dodecahedrons.”

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      For those that don’t know

      Step 1: roll up a half orc barbarian
      Step 2: wield a great axe
      Step 3: roll a natural 20 on an attack

      Now you use the three dodecahedrons!

        • Azzu@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yep, and a greataxe, which is the most common barbarian weapon, uses 1d12 as damage die.

          Now, a crit (natural 20 on a 20 sided die) doubles the dice and makes it 2d12, and half orcs have a feature so that they can roll an additional weapon damage die when critting on their attack, which makes it 3d12.

    • ArtieShaw@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If it came down to figuring out the three dodecahedrons or using the communal sponge on a stick, I’d take the risk with the dodecahedrons.

  • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel like this is just some kind of fidget spinner of ancient times. They must’ve had fads like that too.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      they’ve been found in coin hordes and the like… they were definitely more valuable than that

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        An item that only the absolute best blacksmiths or metalworkers could make.

        Sounds valuable.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wouldn’t they melt them down to make something more useful once it was complete and their skills proven?

      • holycrap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        If the craftsmanship theory is correct they would probably put them on display to advertise their business.

      • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Machinists will often have a tuner’s cube on their desk. It does have a bit of the same feel.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          We’re also in the 21st century, with an abundance of wealth and material possessions the past could only imagine. We can afford lots of useless shit laying around.

          I’ve always leant towards the gloves theory myself.

          • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            If it’s a display of skill then it’s an advertisement, which is useful. Then again, I’m not an archaeologist or historian, and even if I was apparently I’d still have no clue.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              True but who are you going to advertise to? A village would be lucky to have a smith at all, and travel was dangerous so you’re not going to go shopping for someone else. Especially not in the backwater edges of the Roman Empire/Britain.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I am guessing they are a tool of some sort. You can do a lot with angles and rope with two of these.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      As an apprentice blacksmith, yeah. I would have difficulty attempting to make that thing out of bronze, and would definitely learn more about smithing than I do now, just making the thing.

    • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It just hasn’t been proven. Its a fun hypothesis but it could be fucking anything.

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    because it has 12 sides, the dodecahedron was associated with the zodiac… some mystics thought it represented the physical realm… it’s a perfect 3 dimensional shape if you care about the Golden Mean…

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    We have random doodads and thingamabobs that someone made specifically for people to buy and just keep on a shelf for decoration; why can’t that be true of ancient things like these? They certainly look like some random knick knack that would sit on a desk and serve no other purpose.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    if some of them are solid then i’d guess the function is in the knobs. maybe a massage ball? or a hot plate stand? or maybe the knobs are hooks for attaching dangles from?

  • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Some theories are that they functioned as measuring devices, calendars, ornamental scepter toppers, weapons or tools.

    Early D&D dice?

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Romans had dice that would roll better.

      They seem to have favored d20 and d6, but other dice have also been found.

      But I would bring my own to a Roman game of D&D, because the Romans also tended to use lopsided dice (They believed in fate rather than luck, so hand waved away loaded dice)

      • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s fascinating! I had to look it up. They did indeed have d20s.

        Divination – seeking advice about the unknown from the supernatural – seems to be the most likely purpose for the Dakhleh die: the polyhedron might have been thrown in order to determine a god who might assist the practitioner.

        Awesome. So they were basically used in cleric spellcasting.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The knitting technique required to make gloves with that weren’t invented until the 15th or 16th century. And no examples of knit gloves older than that have ever been found.

      Also, many of these dodecahedrons don’t have hollow centers, which is absolutely required for knitting with them.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Ritual purposes

    Oh so no idea what they were for, got it. I can’t believe news orgs still seem not to have caught on about “ritual” artifacts…

    Maybe the romans just played a lot of barbarian characters?

    • Hegar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      By the late empire, if you were playing a legion campaign it was pretty standard to run 30-40% barbarians.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hate to break it to you, but ritual and religion have been a thing forever.

      Walk into most homes today, and you’ll find a bunch of ritual objects. Crosses, Rosary Beads, Menorahs, and dozens of other every day objects that you’d never think twice about.

      The ancient world had even more such objects.

      A fun example that I can think of off the top of my head is the demon trapping bowl. It was common in parts of the Middle East, and how it worked is you’d write a bunch of incantations on the inside of the bowl in a spiral down to the center, and then bury it upside down under the main entrance to your home.

      That’s clearly a ritual object. It serves no other purpose.

      These dodecahedra might be the same. After all, there are 12 zodiac and playing with the meaning of the zodiac was quite popular in the Roman world at various times.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        A bit late replying, but: Sorry, I should maybe have been more clear. This is a very well documented in-joke that I was referencing. It’s a catchall category; “Ritual” is the label given to objects that archeologists don’t have a clue what are. This is extremely prevalent, and if you ask any archeologist about it they’ll verify this.

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s a well known joke for armchair archeologists.

          For the people who work in the field, they know damn well that often times, “ritual object” is, in fact, the correct answer.

          Hell, there are practical tools that were also ritual objects. Because humans can turn everything into part of a religion.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I don’t know how to tell you this, but it’s not just “armchair” archeologists that use this one. Also, jeeze, coming in excessively hostile to a reply to a 5-day-stale comment.

            Ritual object is the correct answer sometimes, but I don’t think you’ve met many archeologists if you’re unaware of the scope here. There’s many reasons “ritual” became a catchall, the prevalence of modern ritual objects among them (sherds are so miserable that it destroys the capacity for humor?). But I urge you to ask some archeologists, even armchair archeologists, about mayan chicken holes sometime. Its a pretty famous example of “ritual” being proven wrong - but it hilights the extent that “ritual” is just the default explanation for all things that lack strong evidence to explain them.