The Biden administration is expected to soon announce plans to redesignate Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen as specially designated global terrorists, according to two people familiar with the White House decision and a U.S. official.

The move comes as the Houthis have launched dozens of attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea. The group says it has attacked the ships in response to Israel’s military operations in Gaza in the aftermath of Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

The three people familiar with the decision were not authorized to comment and requested anonymity to discuss the matter ahead of the expected formal announcement.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel is so brave! Defending itself by stealing a country from the people it was promised to through a campaign of terrorism, and than squeezing down even harder on the oppressed people’s living in the tiny reserves given to them, where they get to live in constant fear of death by Israeli soldiers or missiles.

        How dare they … checks facts … use terrorism, colonialism, and genocide to attack others.

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Taking land to make distance from the people trying to murder them for 70 years. Making a massive security apparatus to protect themselves from the people trying to murder them for 70 years.

          If Arab nationalists and Palestinians weren’t trying to murder Jews, none of this would have happened, they seem addicted to it. This war could be over tomorrow if they released the hostages and surrendered, but clearly they prefer violence against Jews to peace.

          If you want to know why they’re in enclaves and why they don’t have many freedoms, it’s because of all the Jew murdering and refusal to pacify themselves. They want unreasonable unattainable goals, to destroy Israel and take all their land, and they are willing to employ violence until they get it, which means violence forever evidently.

          Choosing violence when you can’t win by violence is a bad idea.

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            >If Arab nationalists and Palestinians weren’t trying to murder Jews,

            the problem isn’t their jewishness, and i know this because israel has muslim, christian, and atheist governmental members.

            the problem is their israeliness.

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            >Taking land to make distance from the people trying to murder them for 70 years

            why do you think they are trying to murder them? did something happen 74 years ago?

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally yes. Israel doesn’t have a right to defend itself from its occupied territories. Of course that’s even assuming we can call what’s going on now “self-defense”, but even if it was this isn’t a war between countries, so the idea that they have a right to defend themselves doesn’t apply any more than the Germans had any right to defend themselves from the Warsaw uprising.

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jews weren’t thrown into the Warsaw ghetto because they attacked peaceful German citizens unprovoked. I find your comparison distasteful.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jews weren’t thrown into the Warsaw ghetto because they attacked peaceful German citizens unprovoked.

            “Unprovoked” uh… you understand Palestinians have suffered violence at the hands of Israel every day since at least 1948, right?

            • DarkGamer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              This conflict started before then, when Arab nationalists started murdering Jews for legally buying land nearby. They keep choosing violence and losing and their situation worsens, you’d think they’d learn by now.

              In 1948 they declared war on Israel, their forces partook in ethnic cleansing and genocide against Jews in Jerusalem and the west bank, and they lost the war, losing territory. They have refused to pacify themselves since then.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Let’s set aside the truth of that statement because it frankly doesn’t matter. Palestinians have suffered ethnic cleansing, occupation and apartheid since 1949. Every one of these is an act of war that makes resistance, including using violence, perfectly legitimate.

                • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Even if it’s legitimate, it’s not viable, wars can’t be won by outrage alone. Massacring raping and kidnapping civilians on the other side will not achieve their stated goals, but it will make life worse for Palestinians. Palestine needs to acknowledge the reality of their situation.

                  If they were to unconditionally surrender like Japan and Germany did, perhaps they would fare as well as those places do today. Violence will only lead to more violence.

        • idoubledo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Israel doesn’t have a right to defend itself from its occupied territories

          1. Why do you think a sovereign state doesn’t have a right to defend its citizens? Oh let me guess - you’re a “from the river to the sea” kind of “humanitarian”.
          2. Gaza is not occupied since 2005, for the purpose of handing it over thousands of Israeli’s were forcefully expelled from the region (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_disengagement_from_Gaza#Description_of_the_plan), not a single Israeli remained in Gaza (unless you count hostages).

          the idea that they have a right to defend themselves doesn’t apply any more than the Germans had any right to defend themselves from the Warsaw uprising

          Yeah, compare labor camps built by the Nazis for the extermination of Jews, where Jews were forcefully transited into, to a piece of land that was claimed and given to the Palestinians. This comparison is absurd.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        DID YOU KNOW

        It is possible to defend one’s country without killing 1% of a region’s civilian population in less than half a year?

        • DarkGamer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did you know that reprisals for unprovoked attacks don’t have to be symmetrical and that doesn’t make it any less defensive?

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you know that reprisal attacks on civilian populations and collective punishment are fucking war crimes? This isn’t news; it’s been well-established since the end of WW fucking 1.

            But hey, continue calling Israel’s war crimes ‘defensive’ and maybe you’ll convince yourself of the holy necessity of genocide.

            • DarkGamer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              These attacks are against Hamas, the once-elected government of Gaza who has widespread support there, not civilian populations.

              Yes yes keep crying wolf until the word genocide is meaningless.

                • DarkGamer@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The blockade in its current form is because of Hamas, there was a far less restrictive blockade before they were elected. Without Hamas there is no October 7th, which means no war and no airstrikes.

                  It’s possible that they just would have chosen a different terrorist group dedicated to genocide of Jews to back though, as they have historically. It’s hard to know what lies on the path not traveled.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The blockade in its current form

                    seems pretty obvious that there was a blockade before october 7, so it’s not possible that october 7 was the start of anything.