• SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I read about this from Erin Reed. She said that there was 1) no place on the rules of the petition that said she had to list it and 2) no place to write it in on the petition

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s also a law that’s been on the books years, and last modified in 1995. It’s a common sense law. Candidates should not be able to hide past indiscretions with a name change. It has nothing to do with trans issues or dead names.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You don’t get to change your first name my marriage, and generally, records are not sealed so people can find out their maiden name. Changing your name via court order can be sealed and often involves changing both first and last names.

            • Rooki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Come on! You can do it better than reddit. Dont be a douchebag and just complain. Make this environment better and friendlier.

              If you think someone is just wrong. Let him be, dont comment like this. Do it better than reddit.

        • derf82@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          She also directly said she agrees with the law.

          People are framing this as some anti-trans law, when that has nothing to do with the original law. In 1995, 99.9% of people had no idea what a deadname is.

    • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Recent” being within 5 years seems understandable in a general political context, however is a little cruel to trans people who usually don’t want their deadnames out in the public. Would this ruling be applied the same way to married people who changed their name?

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Would this ruling be applied the same way to married people who changed their name?

        You would know if you would read the article.

        • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was being rhetorical- I know that they aren’t applying it to married people. But why? Wouldn’t the same reasoning hold, that you could use it to defraud? If not, why wouldn’t changing your name to transition not be in the same category of life event as marriage?

      • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        or, hear me out. if you’re running for political office, you deal with such things like an adult. deadname or not, this person would face MUCH more harsh situations in office than having to put a name you don’t go by anymore.

        • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m afraid that’s a pretty poor argument. It’s not inherently more mature to subject yourself things that harm you because there exist things that can harm you out in the world.

          Please try listening to trans people about their experiences. Deadnaming isn’t just using a old name. For a lot of people, it’s kind of like being called the worst nickname your high school bully had for you, except that everyone in your life, your parents, your friends, everyone, has only called you that for years and years. Some people have a better or at least neutral relationship to their deadname, but it’s still considered incredibly impolite to reference generally speaking.

          In regards to this rule, I don’t see a legitimate argument for excluding name changes from marriage and not similarly applying this exception for name changes for trans people (ie associated with a gender marker change, if we want similar criteria to differentiate from other name changes). Both are life events that should be considered normal and regular and not associated with potential fraud. Either this rule applies equally to everyone, or it shouldn’t be applied at all (like it hasn’t been applied in decades to the extent that it isn’t even on the official form).

            • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              that it has nothing to do with people that think they are something they are not

              Thanks for the explicit transphobia, I’m not interested in continuing this conversation either. Trans people are a normal part of life and until you come to terms with that, you should keep their names out of your mouth.

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Loads of scammers change only their last names, so I don’t really buy that it’s that different. They should require names changed by marriage too if they want the purpose of this to be for tricking the public. If not, then I question how necessary it is in the first place. It’s not a big deal for Cis folks, but it is for Trans folks, so it should be reconsidered.

    • fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      As if the transphobes only want to hear their deadnames to stroke their egos.