jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 年前Does “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down15
arrow-up1141arrow-down1external-linkDoes “and” really mean “and”? Not always, the Supreme Court rules.www.motherjones.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square49fedilink
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 年前Makes Clinton questioning the meaning of the word “is” seem a bit quaint
minus-squaregramathy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 年前To be fair to Clinton he was clarifying on the timeframe intended by the statement because tense matters, e.g. “is, but at the time in question or is, as of right now” because English can definitely be ambiguous sometimes
minus-squarebaldingpudenda@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 年前Bill was a lawyer, he out-lawyered the lawyers and they got mad about it.
Makes Clinton questioning the meaning of the word “is” seem a bit quaint
To be fair to Clinton he was clarifying on the timeframe intended by the statement because tense matters, e.g. “is, but at the time in question or is, as of right now” because English can definitely be ambiguous sometimes
Bill was a lawyer, he out-lawyered the lawyers and they got mad about it.