He was also 1,000% not shot from the front. It’s fucking insane that they’re claiming this in light of so many videos. The exit wound was downward from the left side of his neck, along with all his blood. Did it take a 90+ degree turn? Why didn’t we see it go in from the front? Feel like I’m taking crazy pills.
Do you have any relevant experience? Maybe your guesses about how things should work are simply wrong, and that’s causing your problems.
Watch what happens when a bullet is fired through ballistic gel. It’s not some simple thing where a hard thing goes in one side and stuff comes out the other side.
Why didn’t we see it go in from the front? A rifle bullet travels at hundreds of metres per second. It’s not easy to see it while it is in motion unless you’re using a slow motion camera.
The wound you saw was the entry wound. Blood gushing from the entry wound is very common. According to a relative who is a forensic pathologist.
There isn’t any forensic doubt on how he was shot. The shooter was in front of him. How we are expecting gun shots and blood splatter patterns to behave is rather misinformed by movies and games.
There was immediate blood splatter on the shirt by the wound in his neck when you watch it frame by frame. It does not appear this is an entry wound like you are claiming.
This was also not the caliber they claimed. He was shot from the right side with a smaller caliber bullet.
I watched it from several angles already. You obviously have not so I am not sure why you feel the need to chime in. You are probably just trying to push a narrative (aka propaganda).
uhh…I have the video. That thing absolutely came out the other side…explosively.
He was also 1,000% not shot from the front. It’s fucking insane that they’re claiming this in light of so many videos. The exit wound was downward from the left side of his neck, along with all his blood. Did it take a 90+ degree turn? Why didn’t we see it go in from the front? Feel like I’m taking crazy pills.
Do you have any relevant experience? Maybe your guesses about how things should work are simply wrong, and that’s causing your problems.
Watch what happens when a bullet is fired through ballistic gel. It’s not some simple thing where a hard thing goes in one side and stuff comes out the other side.
Why didn’t we see it go in from the front? A rifle bullet travels at hundreds of metres per second. It’s not easy to see it while it is in motion unless you’re using a slow motion camera.
The wound you saw was the entry wound. Blood gushing from the entry wound is very common. According to a relative who is a forensic pathologist.
There isn’t any forensic doubt on how he was shot. The shooter was in front of him. How we are expecting gun shots and blood splatter patterns to behave is rather misinformed by movies and games.
There was immediate blood splatter on the shirt by the wound in his neck when you watch it frame by frame. It does not appear this is an entry wound like you are claiming.
This was also not the caliber they claimed. He was shot from the right side with a smaller caliber bullet.
It does appear thusly according to a pathologist, but you do you.
I watched it from several angles already. You obviously have not so I am not sure why you feel the need to chime in. You are probably just trying to push a narrative (aka propaganda).
I’m glad such a skilled and trained researcher like yourself is on the case.
Lol wow you are a asshole. Blocked!