Well folks, it finally happened. The screen in your pickup truck… your last bastion of peace from the chaos of unskippable advertisements… now plays popup ads. Not even subtle ones. We’re talking full-dash, head-unit-commandeering infomercial panels in your RAM 1500, like you’re driving a Times Square billboard on wheels.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    When did ads become the one commodity to rule them all. They are used more like a threat rather than information. You have to pay to see them or pay to make them go away. Doesn’t make sense. Have adverts replaced gold as the dollar standard? Weird. I guess they are good for money laundering due to the subjective nature of costs for “production”, “design” and “talent”.

  • Jerb322@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looked at my car radio the other day to see the name of the song playing. Evidently, it was called " injured, get ‘xxxx’ lawyer."

  • Kinperor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m going to start pointing to this when I explain to people why I want “dumb” machines.

    I don’t want AI to “summarize” my google search, I don’t want ads distracting drivers, I don’t want a washing machine that needs updates, I don’t want my TV to look at me, I want a submissive little machine that does task X.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ngl bro but I’ve found some good uses for AI. My kids school gave me 2 bullshit pdfs with duplicate information for their school supplies. I uploaded them to chatgbt and asked it to simplify it by combining duplicates and putting it in bullet format that was easily copy pastable. Did it in 30 seconds with minor tweaking and made my back to school shopping so much easier.

      • no_nothing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        and what the fuck does that have to do with predatory companies cramming unneeded avenues of fucking predation into EVERYTHING?!

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here’s an AI summary of your distain for AI:

      I’ll begin saying this when people ask why I want “dumb” machines.

      AI summaries lack quality, ads distract drivers, you want a washing machine without ads, you don’t want your TV to watch you, you want machines to be submissive.

      How did I do?

    • KayLeadfoot@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Kei Kei’s delivery service.

      I sometimes feel shortchanged as an American (no healthcare, FUUUUCK), but I only get real mad about it when I think about how we don’t get Hiluxes and Kei trucks.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Order a Slate pickup. Buy what you want and only what you want. And add things later as you want or buy that tablet from amazon and a bluetooth speaker and install it yourself.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    3 days ago

    Feel like ads in cars should be illegal, but the US doesn’t have a government that believes in good things.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      If it’s like the other cars with this same shit then it only plays when fully stopped.

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which will result in even more people not coming to a complete stop if they think they can get away with it, and that will result in more accidents.

          • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            Absolutely fucking not.

            My attention is not free and they have no fucking right to my attention.

            And second, fuck them for thinking they do.

            • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s obviously better not to show ads while you’re driving. How could anyone think otherwise?

              The question was if it is better to show ads only when the car is stopped. Your answer is for a different question: should it show ads at all. Being angry at me isn’t going to make Dodge stop this stupid idea.

              • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’m not mad at you at all. I’m mad at the motherfuckers who think they have a right to my attention.

                But to respond - it’s not better, because either option is detestable. I reject both.

                You correctly called it that we’re answering different questions. I reject the question you’re answering, because I do not accept advertisements in my vehicle, that I own, as a foregone conclusion. You accidentally’d a step in accepting their bullshit.

                I literally would rather threaten legal action, or show up outside their advertising executive’s house with a megaphone to try to sell them some scammy bullshit while they expect privacy. Maybe I’d even read off the advertising I get on the console. (Not that I’d ever buy a RAM truck, but still.)

                New Business Idea: Buy unzoned property that can be used to block scenic overlooks around the homes of scummy advertising executives. Put up billboards.

  • kolorafa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think all people that see that ads need to pickup a phone and call them asking stupid questions and waste their time, they clearly ask you to do that.

  • canajac@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    I call on all hackers to defeat this parasitic disease from incorporating our everyday lives only to make money for its creators. Ads are a fucking disease and needs to be contrroled from entering our lives without our permission.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Stellantis is a Dutch group. If we head to Michigan and get the CEO, they’ll just appoint a new one… Unless you’re suggesting the Americans invade the Netherlands…

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So now this is an ad? But when Apple does similar it’s just letting you know about services offered. I consider both an ad.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    189
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I remember a while ago when this started appearing in chargers and they tried to act like it was an accident.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      110
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is the defacto stance of advertising agencies doing horrible things.

      “OOHHHH, You mean you DIDN’T want ads on your coffee maker or vibrator??? Our bad. This was a technical error we will fix immediately!”

      • morphballganon@mtgzone.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        3 days ago

        They don’t admit it’s a mistake, call it an error, or try to fix. They call it a feature.

        Vote with wallet

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Back at the office:

        So it seems people don’t like ads on their vibrator which means they are viewing them. Let’s wait a couple of years for the anger to die down then do it again.

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    GM was talking pretty publicly about doing this a couple years ago and there was a mild dust up over it. They also mentioned enthusiasm over the potential revenue to come from mining and selling driver data (which got them sued) . Last I heard about it was late 2023 or early 2024, so it seems their new data team.has been busy.

    Don kid yourselves though, if GM is doing it, everyone else is or will be.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      The field that marketing companies truly excel at the most is advertising their own services. Researching the effectiveness of advertising is difficult because most of the information is presented by the marketing companies themselves. However, most scientific studies agree that advertising through environmental means is ineffective and sometimes can even be harmful to brands.

      Marketing usually aims to take advantage of impulsive purchasing behaviour by inundating the potential purchasers environment with advertisement. However, this isn’t very effective, most people automatically filter these kinds of ads, or worse are actively annoyed by them. Effective advertising activates the buyers impulsive behavior by engaging with them emotionally, which is why ad space for podcasts and other types of para social relationships are more effective.

      I’d say the vast majority of data scraped from personal devices are utilized as tools to market the idea of advertisement to vendors more than they are used to actually market products. Imo marketing is useless for most types of businesses, and is mostly a field of self perpetuating scam artist.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Apparently it’s mostly about familiarity. Even if we are annoyed at the time, we will often forget about it completely between then and shopping. By the time we are in the shop, we just have a vague sense of familiarity with the product. We instinctively buy the more familiar, as the “safer” option. It takes conscious effort to overcome this (which most people don’t have to spare).

        In saturated markets, this leads to a zero sum situation. Every customer you get is stolen from a competitor. Apparently the tobacco companies actually loved the UK ban on tobacco advertising. Their ads were intended to counter the ads of their competitors. None of them were roping in new smokers at a high enough rate to matter. The only ones winning were the ad agencies.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          we just have a vague sense of familiarity with the product. We instinctively buy the more familiar, as the “safer” option. It takes conscious effort to overcome this (which most people don’t have to spare).

          Sounds like a perfect pitch to sell more ads. Like I said, I would hesitate to actually trust any statistical analysis of the effectiveness of advertising done by the same people wanting to sell more ads.

          In a capitalist economy there’s just not a real motivation for researching advertising unless you are a marketing agency. So the vast majority of information is intrinsically biased.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think it’s more that if you stop advertising, you start seeing a significant drop in sales. It’s an easy experiment to test.

            The dark art is increasing sales via advertising. That’s where the marketing people pull off the real bullshit.

      • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree that it seems most marketing firms are seemingly scamming businesses at this point. The internet is so saturated with absolute garbage ads that anyone buying ads must be expecting $0.001 return on the ad dollar.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is why the argument that paying for something would prevent ads falls apart. If they can squeeze more money out of people then they will, even if those people are paying $80k+ for the damn thing.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes I hate that argument and it’s not true. Cars are collecting tons of data and we pay for them, people “pay” for Windows one way or another and it’s collecting data.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just terrible. Every aspect of life doesn’t need ads. I don’t care if it makes a company money or not.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Stellantis doing Stellantis things…

    It’s remarkable that anyone buys Dodge/Ram/Chrysler/Jeep given how crappy Stellantis has been.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    If they can in a crash, they can blame it on the advertisers’ distraction. Insurers will love that.