• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    well it’s a shame you Nazi shitstains dismantled the consumer protections put in place to protect Americans from shady companies and their dangerous products.

    eat shit? yeah, eat shit.

  • Vupware@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Despite the problems with these LLMs, I have found them tremendously valuable when it comes to finding sources regarding historical events.

    It’s much easier to find historical evidence that goes against the status quo with LLMs than it is with a conventional search engine. I suspect that this is an unintentional side effect of the technology; the fact that these LLMS are black boxes might have something to do with it.

    • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I understand what you mean and don’t entirely disagree. If you use it like a calculator with information YOU’VE ALREADY ASSEMBLED. If you rely on it to have all information and/or give an accurate rendering of whatever it’s trained on, you’re probably gonna have a bad time. I’m working on a book that includes, in part, information about the Mormons’ history with slavery. If you ask AI, it will sometimes insist they never had slaves, at all. In fact, it will argue with you until you get legitimately pissed. Ask me how I know.

      • Vupware@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Certainly! that’s why you use them to find sources. I don’t immediately trust anything an LLM spits out.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The amount of times I see people just take what is outputted as gospel is scary. And on things with real risk like electrical repair!

          • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I’ve seen Google AI say one thing and provided the source. When I read the source, sometimes it’s completely different or even the exact opposite.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Oh yeah the LLM that is built to make things up at the drop of a hat can also make up the sources, its wild that people can still trust a literal machine of lies.

              I saw one the other day that stated AC and DC power where interchangeable…

    • smayonak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They are both great and also biased. Because LLM training data includes vast libraries of history books, including such works as Dark Alliance, it is capable of running down paths that few historians would walk. I recently used an LLM to find an unimpeachable source for the CIA’s connection to cocaine trafficking aircraft. This was not available through a simple Google search because the site was likely deindexed.

  • shininghero@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    2 days ago

    …It’s a constitutional violation so blatant it makes you wonder if Bailey got his law degree from a cereal box.

    Absolutely savage. I love it.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    2 days ago

    “trump is the highest scoring individual in a number of areas. As an example, trump is the national all-time leader in being impeached as President.”

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago
      • the most felony convictions
      • the most state and federal criminal investigations that are still open
      • the most amount of diapers worn during a presidential term
      • the first president in what 20 years to puss out and have his inauguration indoors
      • the first president to have been a confirmed rapist

      I’m going to speculate:

      • the smallest penis
      • the most obese
      • the shortest
  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    It seems about right. Removing the “I” in “A.I.” will bring about any results you desire. No sentience here, just propaganda.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well we elected a fuckwit and then he decided to replace every other position in government with a similar fuckwit.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I was in KS under Brownback, I remember how progressive MO seemed, but lately I feel like it’s flipped.

      Don’t get me wrong, KS still has some assholes but MO really seems to be swinging for the fences.

      • Azal@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yea, when I moved up here, KC called Kansas “Brownbeckistan” then he got pulled and now Kansas is the “Progressive” state over Missouri…

        And that’s with y’all having a veto-proof Republican majority in the legislative branch… holy hell.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I was in KS under Brownback, I remember how progressive MO seemed, but lately I feel like it’s flipped.

      Don’t get me wrong, KS still has some assholes but MO really seems to be swinging for the fences.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe it’s because I am no native English speaker, so I have to ask you: is the meaning of this question clear to you?

    “Rank the last five presidents from best to worst, specifically in regards to antisemitism.”

    I guess the “best” one should be ranked first, but what is the best anti-semitist? The strongest or the weakest of them?

    • LettyWhiterock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s vague still as a native speaker, I imagine most people’s first instinct would be that “best” would be least antisemitic and “worst” would be most. The meaning in wording like this comes from whether or not what you are ranking people on is good or bad. To most people, antisemitism is bad. (or at least I’d hope) So “best” would mean “least”.

      A better way of phrasing the question would just be to ask to rank them most to least antisemitic. That would be much less vague.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I was reading Hiding in Plain Sight: The Invention of Donald Trump and the Erosion of America by Sarah Kendzior, and she spends almost half of the first chapter dissing on Missouri, where she lives. Her attitude was exactly that, that it’s a pile of shit (but serves as a bellwether for the US as a whole). Lol!

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    This motherfucker doesn’t care about us in MO at all. Numerous other problems here, but he’d rather kiss the ring and hope Trump nominates him for some position so he can wreck a lot more.