• deranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Medical debt can be dissolved in probate, just potentially not the kind related to say, nursing homes, assuming you’re in one of those states, and you’re in a rare scenario when they actually enforce it. I’m not responsible for my parents medical debt; I am responsible for their care and medical debt can be a part of that, but not necessarily, as in the pacemaker example I used earlier. That pacemaker example would fall into the same category as other debtors seeing payment from the estate.

    There’s no ad hominem in my comments. Quote me, and don’t paraphrase and put quotes around it. Implications are neither here nor there, either. I’m saying you’re wrong because the facts don’t support your points, not because of any personal characteristics you have. A prime example is you mistakenly equating any medical debt to what would be covered under filial responsibility.

    ”filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”

    It is remarkable how you selectively quote what I said. You left out “…to the state”, which is a key part of the point I was making about how a child would never be responsible for their parents child support debt.

    Once again, you demonstrate your ignorance of the laws here in the United States, something which you have no experience with, nor any sort of legal expertise. You may want to work on that reading comprehension rather than spending time formatting your text just so.

    Medical debt is dismissed in probate insolvency, except in rare cases.

    Why are you talking about medical debt? We’ve already established that it’s an exception to this. […] Why is medical debt not dissolved in probate, despite insolvency? Because of filial laws Are you gonna ignore that?

    Dude you contradict yourself in the same paragraph here, lol. Is it an exception or not? For the record, it is dissolved unless it’s debt directly related to care, and only in rare cases is that actually enforced.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      in probate

      UUUH, he’s *learned the words! Only after me repeating them a dozen fuckingtimes :D

      Blablabla more excuses and more denial.

      Why is medical debt not dissolved in probate, despite insolvency? Because of filial laws Are you gonna ignore that?

      Filial responsibility laws aren’t only for medical debts, you were wrong. Are you gonna ignore that?

      And before all that, you were saying that “filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”. Are you gonna ignore that?

      You simply can’t argue, you don’t know the subject, and you should’ve taken the gracious option I offered earlier. ;)

      You’re simply not man enough to admit to when you’re wrong, and that’s why you’re never gonna learn, and why you’re gonna stay a small, insignificant ignorant arsehole who no-one will ever love.

      Dude you contradict yourself in the same paragraph here, lol. Is it an exception or not?

      I’m not contradicting anything. Do you not speak English. Medical debt is the established exception. I’m asking for you to say what the reason is for that exception. Which you simply aren’t abled enough to do.

      Why is medical debt not dissolved in probate, despite insolvency? Because of filial laws Are you gonna ignore that?

      Filial responsibility laws aren’t only for medical debts, you were wrong. Are you gonna ignore that?

      And before all that, you were saying that “filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”. Are you gonna ignore that?

      You simply can’t argue, you don’t know the subject, and you should’ve taken the gracious option I offered earlier. ;)

      Next I’ll stop replying to any of your personal bullshit, and just post facts about the thread and the convo we’ve had, the questions you’ve answered. Then you won’t be able to answer them and you’ll fuck off in a week or so, your tail between your legs. Like the thousand or so other pathetic cases I’ve seen before who can’t admit when they’ve wrong.

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        And before all that, you were saying that “filial responsibility laws have NOTHING to do with debt”. Are you gonna ignore that?

        Even after I pointed out you misquoted me here, you’re still doing it. You’re leaving out a key piece of the quote which is extremely relevant to your frankly ridiculous claim about being responsible for your parent’s child support debt, or other debts to the state.

        Dog, you’re the one spewing personal bullshit. You just can’t make a reply without a half dozen personal digs.