I must have missed this comment, clicked read some night.
So now you’re pretending you haven’t said the moronic things that everyone can see you have? Just how deluded must you be to do that?
You said you hadn’t made ad hominems, after which I copied an exact ad hominem. You’re gonna ignore that, because you’re not man enough to admit to your mistakes.
You said VERBATIM; “Filial responsibility laws have nothing to do with debt to the state.”
You said filial responsibility laws ONLY concern medical debt. Wrong. Simply wrong. Not only does this contradict the previous statement, which means you indirectly admit that you were wrong, but also, it’s wrong as well.
See, that’s why my comment, several replies ago, about you not understanding ad hom:, being personal has nothing to do with an ad hominem. I can say “you’re wrong, because here’s how it actually goes, here’s actual sources for this claim, silly.”
That’s not an ad hominem.
But if I said “you’re wrong BECAUSE you’re silly”, that would be an ad hominem.
You simply keep being wrong, but you’re too small of a man to admit to a single mistake. And I’m gonna keep laughing at you for it until you have a tantrum worse than a six-year old, because again, everyone can see how wrong you are and now we’re just gonna expose your childlike ego in this thread. Like I said at the start, you should’ve taken the gracious option.
Now you’ll get schooled by me and humiliated by yourself. Although that’s happened like a dozen times already. I literally had to point out LITERALLY the first words in these articles which have sources, yet all you can come up with “nuh-uh, I’m american and you’re not so I know better because my arse is trustworthier than some credible sources”.
Filial responsibility laws have nothing to do with debt to the state.
I must have missed this comment, clicked read some night.
So now you’re pretending you haven’t said the moronic things that everyone can see you have? Just how deluded must you be to do that?
You said you hadn’t made ad hominems, after which I copied an exact ad hominem. You’re gonna ignore that, because you’re not man enough to admit to your mistakes.
You said VERBATIM; “Filial responsibility laws have nothing to do with debt to the state.”
You said filial responsibility laws ONLY concern medical debt. Wrong. Simply wrong. Not only does this contradict the previous statement, which means you indirectly admit that you were wrong, but also, it’s wrong as well.
See, that’s why my comment, several replies ago, about you not understanding ad hom:, being personal has nothing to do with an ad hominem. I can say “you’re wrong, because here’s how it actually goes, here’s actual sources for this claim, silly.”
That’s not an ad hominem.
But if I said “you’re wrong BECAUSE you’re silly”, that would be an ad hominem.
You simply keep being wrong, but you’re too small of a man to admit to a single mistake. And I’m gonna keep laughing at you for it until you have a tantrum worse than a six-year old, because again, everyone can see how wrong you are and now we’re just gonna expose your childlike ego in this thread. Like I said at the start, you should’ve taken the gracious option.
Now you’ll get schooled by me and humiliated by yourself. Although that’s happened like a dozen times already. I literally had to point out LITERALLY the first words in these articles which have sources, yet all you can come up with “nuh-uh, I’m american and you’re not so I know better because my arse is trustworthier than some credible sources”.