• theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Having a .22 under the Christmas tree and having unsupervised access to it are two very different things. I know plenty of people who got rifles for their younger children but keep them in a safe with their own guns until the kids are older.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The parents are on trial for manslaughter because they gave their kid a gun like you might give your kid an action figure, with zero restrictions or teaching about respect for life whatsoever. There is a right way to handle kid’s access to guns and many wrong ways.

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Calm down and stop using straw man arguments. The only one acting offended here is you.

              • 520@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Why don’t you learn to read?

                Because I was actually fucking agreeing with you.

                Yes, IMO these parents do need to be, as you put it, evaluated, so that we can tell apart the responsible tutors from the irresponsible asshats like the woman who got charged.

                We have evaluation systems for firearms literally everywhere else in the world. Fuck, in the US, you have evaluation systems for cars but not fucking guns.