Reads like the author moonlights for the Onion.
Other accounts:
@subignition (dead?)
@subignition
Reads like the author moonlights for the Onion.
Missing ligament? Like because of genetics or something? That’s wild
Amusing that aside from the GPU TFLOPS the rest of it is a slight improvement if at all
Can you please leave the whole “responding when you’re not the person who was asked” bit behind, thanks
so an empathetic government could have actually just handed them all relief checks a la COVID
If you consider yourself a noodle, I respect that, but this ain’t the way to season your pasta water, chief
There is a risk if you have an extreme intake, but it’s going to be pretty hard to do that by seasoning your food with lite salt unless you’re doing something really extreme. Most people have a RDA of at least 2g of potassium, and I would hazard a guess that most people who are being told by their doctors to cut down on sodium intake probably aren’t getting a ton of potassium from what they’re eating.
Eliminating bullshit on the costs side of the equation is also important work that should be done.
It’s worth noting that profit margins for farmers are a LOT thinner on average than the limits I spitballed above. You can’t quite get from raw prices to profit margins directly, but the further away you get from the farmers, the more bullshit there seems to be.
Needs crossposted to !foodcrimes@midwest.social
I’m not religious, but this situation really makes me yearn for Hell’s fiery maw to open up and claim the cop, the judge, and the “therapist”.
May they end up spending eternity as a human centipede. Or better yet, make it a closed loop.
Profit limits of 10-20% across all sorts of essential industries would be good, I think.
Have some kind of progressive tax incentive where if your profit comes in under the limit you get a tax credit, and if your profit is over the limit you pay higher and higher taxes until it’s quickly not worth it anymore.
I don’t know the details, but some system where responsible businesses are better off overall than exploitative ones…
How did you take away “they were asking about Mastodon” when the question mentioned bluesky first? OP was asking for a comparison of the two, which your link does not provide, putting your answer somewhere between unhelpful and irrelevant.
You keep arguing with people pointing this out as if your response was a complete answer… It seems like you cherry picked the middle of their question and ignored the rest. The more-generous interpretation of this scenario is that your reading comprehension sucks. That’s my point.
And if you’re really feeling so insulted by my pointing that out,
Dude, grow up.
edit: and it would have taken such a small additional effort to maybe clarify that you were only addressing part of the question instead of dropping a link with no explanation. You could’ve prevented a lot of confusion by being a little less lazy in your original reply.
Removed by mod
It’s real dangerous to look at someone seeking legal representation and take that as an implication of guilt.
Not defending Mr Beast at all, I’m sure there is no shortage of actual evidence of wrongdoing
Yesssssss please regulate the shit out of social media
There might be some question over whether a simple-enough algorithm (such as newest or most voted sort) should be excepted if opted into by the user.
I’d be fine with the defaults being newest-to-oldest or top-score, depending on the type of site.
One more great reason not to use Apple phones.
Tellier was “a shining light every day he graced the halls of Morgan Academy,” school headmaster Bryan Oliver said on Facebook. “He was a student, a friend, an athlete and most important a Christ follower.
Ugh. Really got your priorities in order there, Mr. Oliver
If you’re lucky, the Devil’s gonna smell like sulfur and your nose won’t be able to pick up on anything else
The dating pool is functionally infinite, giving up is like the one possible mistake.