that thermostat factor reduces actual demand by a little, doesn’t impact the net difference per se.

the difference between demand and net demand in that graph is purely solar/wind generation, isn’t it?

:consoling tailpats:

deleted by creator

are we sure its not a ryobi

but jesus is everywhere

Upper burr carrier looks good to me.

the immersion phase is samey but the slurry is sitting on top of a filter so when you open the switch it gets filtered by gravity pulling the coffee through the paper. contrast with french press (no paper) and aeropress (coffee forced with pressure through the paper)

whiffs of ‘crusade’

was this a Jack Handey

right you will need a grinder that has a fine range of adjustment in grind size around the limit of what you are using now

publish your scripts and you might save the next guy some hours 🙂

people are using it to just refer to experimentation here but it has some charged political interpretations as well

“you were already in for 4.67, so we’re taking it”

ah i had forgotten about xf86config. /silenthillvoice

bbt is blackface

the main thing i generally shoot for pouring-wise is avoiding churning up the coffee bed by over-aggressively pouring. i feel it causes migration of the fines, which is usually detrimental.

how many espresso shots in a month does it take for me to equal one cheeseburger

woodshedding

if you find you are clogging a lot but the taste is good and you just want to clog less, try minimizing agitation (and disturbance of the coffee bed by overagressive pouring). keeping the bed ‘intact’ keeps the fines in the matrix rather than migrating them to the filter