Bolstered by a momentous ICJ ruling, Palestinians, including Americans, gave three hours of testimony against the Biden administration.

Lawyers involved with the lawsuit playing out in federal court said that the ICJ ruling bolsters their case. Their lawsuit argues that Biden, Blinken, and Austin are liable under U.S. law for failing to uphold their obligation to prevent genocide in Gaza.

Barry Trachtenberg, a professor of Jewish history and author of two books about the Holocaust, testified as an expert witness in the case – over repeated objections from Justice Department attorneys. When he filed his declaration in the case in November, he said, some 11,000 Palestinians had been killed. Today, that number is far greater.

“Everything that we feared and more is unfolding,” he said, noting that often, legal actions about genocide happen long after the fact. “What makes this situation so unique is that we’re watching the genocide unfold as we speak. And we’re in this incredibly unique position where we can actually intervene to stop it using the mechanisms of international law that are available to us.”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    What you’re saying is untrue.

    The parties say two different things. They do exactly the same things with the same results.

    And I’m about 30 years past giving parties credit for saying good things and doing bad things.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You’re correct in sentiment, but good luck explaining how the lesser of two evils is still evil whilst claiming the result is the same. You’re conflating a lot of topics by bringing in Israel’s actions. The result is exactly the same because there is a third actor doing it.

      Even when it’s strictly things state side, it’s only “exactly the same” if the bar is, “it won’t get completely fixed”, because there is a HUGE difference between Republican plans and Democrat plans. Even if the Dems are still barely offering crumbs, it’s more crumbs than a kick in the teeth.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        No they’re both kicks in the teeth. Maybe one with a steel toed boot and the other with a tennis shoe but… it’s still a kick to the teeth.