• Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So, the Swiss suicide pod lets you kill yourself with nitrogen gas, and apparently that’s absolutely fine and painless.

    Alabama thinks about using nitrogen gas, and it’s cruel and unusual?

    WTF am I missing here? Or is it all just the BS hyperbole of US politics?

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well clearly the difference is the Swiss suicide pod is for suicide, and in Alabama it is state-sanctioned murder.

      I can understand disagreeing about the death penalty but the difference between choosing to do this to yourself vs it being done to you regardless of your feelings is a dramatic difference, is it not?

      • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re forgetting that this person is going to die by the State’s hand regardless of the method. Given that, how is nitrogen asphyxiation more cruel than lethal injection?

        I’m not condoning the death penalty, just confused why someone would say nitrogen asphyxiation is cruel and unusual when in another context it’s desirable.

        • Pronell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I’m not forgetting that, not really. I was just breaking down the comparison between assisted suicide and the death penalty.

          I’m against the death penalty but if we are going down that route nitrogen hypoxia seems the sanest and safest way to me.

      • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        First off, I’m 100% against the death penalty, this is only an argument of pragmatism. Nitrogen is by far the most simple and humane method at the states disposal to perform executions. The rapid hypoxia will leave the victim unconscious within a minute and death will happen shortly after. It requires minimal equipment and essentially no training to be effective with this method. People who perform lethal injections receive no training and fuck it up way too much for it to be considered safe. If the state is going to execute people (which they shouldn’t) they should seek to limit the amount of suffering and margin for error and inert gas asphyxiation is a good choice for both of those. If they wanted to make us easier on the victim they should consider giving them an oral sedative like versed shortly before the execution. Regardless, they’ll be out in under a minute so it still minimizes pain and suffering

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      The authors argue:

      • Nitrogen execution forces prisoners to participate in their own death, which they consider cruel

      • Delivery by mask is unproven and could lead to problems (like CO2 buildup).

      • the protocol is heavily redacted and many other executions have been botched before, which does not inspire confidence.

      • a lack of oxygen can lead to convulsions, which can prolong the execution if the airways are affected

      • in case of a failed execution the prisoner is entitled to medical help. This could be difficult or even dangerous to administer in an environment of little to no oxygen

      • mice did show a fear response when executed with nitrogen

      While I do agree with those points and oppose lethal punishment myself, I would not expect the arguments to make a big legal difference. All of them do apply to other execution methods as well, and usually much worse. Personally, I would prefer a death by nitrogen to any other method on offer, if there is to be an execution.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      When you call things whatever you want, you open the door to abusing the law however you like!

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Alabama people against it are just retarded is what you’re missing. It’s probably the most peaceful way to kill someone. No taste, no needles, bullets, or guillotine. You just get sleepy and that’s it.