Summary

Donald Trump’s plan to use recess appointments for key roles could spark a Supreme Court challenge, as Senate Republicans may resist confirming controversial nominees.

Recess appointments, which bypass Senate approval, were restricted in a 2014 Supreme Court ruling, but Trump might test limits by forcing a Senate recess using a rarely invoked constitutional provision.

The conservative-majority Supreme Court could revisit its stance, though precedent favors limiting such appointments.

Legal challenges could delay any impact, as standing requires an affected party to sue, potentially prolonging disputes for years.

  • PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Does anyone actually see much opposition to trump’s will from the spineless republicans? They fell in line completely. The outliers are insignificant. The party will fall in line with whatever that orange asshole wants.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I expect very mild resistance from Congress and SCOTUS. While all of them do have their lips glued to Trumps ass a spineless weasel is always a spineless weasel, if they thought distancing themselves from Trump was the most advantageous move they’d do it. They’ll want to build in a tiny bit of plausibility if they want to start saying they did their jobs and didn’t just defer to Daddy Trump.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      McTurtle has publicly stated that he opposes and will fight against recess appointments. His brain is cooked and he’s on his way out so he doesn’t have to worry about getting primaried. I hope he’s true to his word.