• Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not sure how being unrelated to a separate event which wasn’t mentioned or referenced at all in the headline makes it clickbait.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The picture is a Boeing.

      And this would never be a headline if not for the other story.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think the average person can identify the difference between a Boeing or an Airbus. It’s clearly a stock photo and isn’t meant to represent the actual plane from the story, either way.

        “Bad reporting” I’d agree with, but “clickbait” not so much.

        • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That’s like reporting on Teslas catching fire after a bender but using a photo of a Jeep Wrangler. They’re 2 entirely separate aircraft and should be treated as such.

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’m pretty sure the average person can tell the difference between a Tesla and a Jeep, though.

            It doesn’t matter, anyway. It’s not a part of the story.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because it feeds off of fear. A319 are not Boeing and they don’t have plug doors. This story wouldn’t have made the news a week ago. The likelihood of this being anything other than just a sensor error is low.