• blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    He probably could, netanyahu would have a hard time saying no, for one good reason. We’re supplying the weapons and money, we can end his resources for the genocide with or without his say.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      He probably could

      And yet you also think

      No ones criticizing him for not stopping it

      If you think he is capable of doing so, why wouldn’t the criticism not only exist from others on the left, but also be warranted?

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You actually just got this person to call themselves out without them even knowing.

        Bravo!

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bad wording, of course people want him to stop it. Not criticizing him for doing nothing maybe.

          If I’m off the mark, what IS this trying to express? In ‘good wording’, if you will.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              The second sentence?

              Sure. What does “Not criticizing him for doing nothing maybe.” mean?

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                Hes not an innocent bystander thats not taking action to stop this genocide. Hes taking action to cause the genocide. If he did nothing instead the genocide wouldnt have the funds and weapons to do what its doing.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Then you agree that there are people are operating under the delusion that Biden can stop the genocide with a snap of his fingers and are criticizing him for that, making your original objection to the guy with a smiley face avatar utterly pointless.

                  • blazera@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    No theres people accusing him of facilitating the genocide.

                    Like people arent protesting in Japan that their Prime Minister isnt stopping the genocide.

                • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  They’d absolutely have the funds and weapons to do what it’s doing.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nuclear weapons don’t really provide room to maneuver when you’re on the phone with the US President, unless you’re willing to threaten a nuclear strike on the US.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Obviously Israel isn’t threatening the US. They’re threatening Iran