Multiple space agencies are looking to send crewed missions to the Moon’s southern polar region in this decade and the next. Moreover, they intend to create the infrastructure that will allow for a sustained human presence, exploration, and economic development. This requires that the local geography, resources, and potential hazards be scouted in advance and … Continue reading "China Creates a High-Resolution Atlas of the Moon"

Really important step towards expanding our research on the moon, is creating highly detailed maps of the entire surface.

China is doing some great work on building out infrastructure and studies of the moon. They’re the only country that’s brought back any moon rocks in decades.

Space Race 3.0 is on, and we’ll see how different approaches to the research and manned missions will move forward.

The US is currently building out an extremely upfront cost heavy project, but with a lot of long term benefits.

China is building a more straightforward moon project, but with higher ongoing costs, as much of the infrastructure is disposable (more like Apollo).

  • Bizzle@lemmy.worldEnglish
    66·
    6 months ago

    It’s nuts to me that just fuckin’ throwing away a billion dollar rocket has ever been acceptable. It sucks that the Americans didn’t spend all this money in 1962, imagine where we’d be now!

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      63·
      6 months ago

      I would argue that it’s a better world because Americans spent all that money. Those billion dollar rockets are how we learned to utilize space. In the process, we built gps, satellite communications, digital cameras and countless other technologies that the world enjoys today.

      Without the space program we would never have had super soakers, and frankly, I didn’t want to live in a world like that.

      *Super soakers were invented by a NASA engineer. It’s not hard to see how much a super soaker has in common with the fuel injection system for a pressure fed rocket, they’re essentially the same thing.

      All that said, you’re not entirely wrong, throwing away rockets is a bit crazy. But we’ve come a long way in the field of reusable rockets. Within 3 years, I expect we will be putting a whole lot more in orbit at a much lower cost, because fully reusable rockets are nearly here.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      42·
      6 months ago

      I’m not sure it would have been possible. The amount of computing power to land a rocket like that is insane.

      In order to land in other ways, the rocket has to be really small (parachutes) or have too much weight consumed by an airframe (space shuttle).

      It probably wouldn’t have been possible to get to the moon with the restrictions those designs would have imposed.