Optional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThe Have Yachtslemmy.worldimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageThe Have Yachtslemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareHydraulicMonkey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoYeah, so to simplify, written off at a different rate.
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoNot really, at all. It’s written off at the same rate, while being subject to a whole other type of tax, which means the company pays more tax, rather than less.
minus-squareHydraulicMonkey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoOk, so the point I was originally trying to make was that claiming a yacht as an entertainment expense was less attractive. Would you agree?
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·1 year agoIf sticking a fork in your eye is “less attractive” than eating icecream then sure. … but let’s be honest, that’s not what you were trying to say. You were just plain wrong. Get over it. No one cares.
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThe only one who can’t admit they were wrong here is you.
Yeah, so to simplify, written off at a different rate.
Not really, at all.
It’s written off at the same rate, while being subject to a whole other type of tax, which means the company pays more tax, rather than less.
Ok, so the point I was originally trying to make was that claiming a yacht as an entertainment expense was less attractive. Would you agree?
If sticking a fork in your eye is “less attractive” than eating icecream then sure.
… but let’s be honest, that’s not what you were trying to say. You were just plain wrong. Get over it. No one cares.
The only one who can’t admit they were wrong here is you.