• lemmyarcade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    And they wonder why we get all these migrants at our southern border. Maybe if they hadn’t destabilized the entire region to the south people wouldn’t be trying to escape those places.

    • Traister101@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean the big ones people like to point at (Rushia and fucking Nazi Germany) sure as shit weren’t doing communism or socialism

      • darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not sure if alternative spelling or if your autocorrect really likes controversial vtuber Uruha Rushia.

      • ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Even the DDR wasn’t doing socialism. The public had to be all-in the idea, or they were discredited or arrested. It was an authoritarian autocracy acting in the name of socialism.

        • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That is indeed what your capitalist NGOs tell you with unlimited funds.

          Consider that socialism is about control over the means of production, of deposing the capitalist system, and that your dismissal of the DDR as socialist didn’t address that at all. Do you think it’s possible you’ve been lied to?

          • ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            No, I think I’m far enough on the left to be aware of capitalist propaganda. In all fairness to you, my statement did not treat the subject with the appropriate nuance the subject should require.

            The DDR was socialist. However, it was state socialism, which in my opinion is not ideal and not something we should strive to replicate. Yes, the means of production were “owned by the people,” but the state tasks itself with protecting the people. And therein lies the problem with state socialism - the state is easily commandeered by a corrupt minority who then uses the governmental apparatus to run an authoritarian regime. Precisely what happened in the DDR and the USSR.

            We should be able to recognize the imperfections in prior socialist attempts, without immediately calling it “capitalist NGO propaganda.”

        • TxzK@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think anyone points at Nazi Germany as an example of a leftist system

          I’ve seen many idiots do that unfortunately

        • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Both Crowder and Shapiro have claimed this. They point out that the Nazi party was the ‘National Socialist German workers’ party’ and claim that’s enough for it to be socialist, and then also claim Russia is a communist country.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            There’s a Hitler quote somewhere, in some letter that was like “we laugh at the fools who think our ideology has anything to do with the socialism of the bolsheviks”

            There was another one where he says “I didn’t want to kill the Jews, but they’re all communists”

            Someone with a better ability to keep track of sources than me probably knows where to find them

            • Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago
              You may be referring to a line from Mein Kampf, volume 2, chapter 4.

              The fact that we had chosen red as the colour for our posters sufficed to attract them to our meetings. The ordinary bourgeoisie were very shocked to see that, we had also chosen the symbolic red of Bolshevism and they regarded this as something ambiguously significant. The suspicion was whispered in German Nationalist circles that we also were merely another variety of Marxism, perhaps even Marxists suitably disguised, or better still, Socialists. The actual difference between Socialism and Marxism still remains a mystery to these people up to this day.

              The charge of Marxism was conclusively proved when it was discovered that at our meetings we deliberately substituted the words ‘Fellow-countrymen and Women’ for ‘Ladies and Gentlemen’ and addressed each other as ‘Party Comrade’. We used to roar with laughter at these silly faint‐hearted bourgeoisie and their efforts to puzzle out our origin, our intentions and our aims.


              And the other paraphrase sounds like a reply to Planck:

              Planck began his intercession on behalf of Haber, even going so far as to say that without the latter’s chemical process for obtaining ammonia from the nitrogen of the air “the previous war would have been lost from the beginning.” To this remark Hitler retorted: “I have nothing at all against the Jews themselves. But the Jews are all Communists, and these are my enemies — it is against these that I am fighting.”

        • Traister101@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s always as a “See!! Socialism bad!!” but yep they were literally fascist, Rushia too and yet here we are with people still thinking communist Rushia was communist.