I don’t really know how to structure this question, but yeah, why is always Naval and never Aviation?

  • franzfurdinand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think most generally it’s because naval analogues are probably the closest when you’re talking about large space-based fighting vessels. The air force doesn’t operate aircraft carriers, battleships, or destroyers. The navy, however, does (or did in the case of battleships). Those large sea based vessels often class quite nicely into a lot of sci-fi media for large ships.

    The small ships you see are often based off of a carrier equivalent. Even when they’re terrestrially based, it makes a lot of sense to streamline your military structure to have just one “space force”, rather than trying to break it up into two entities like the “space navy” and “space air force”, each with their own standards and logistical supply networks.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want a meme where the air force is like “we conquered the skies, next is space!” And the Navy is like guess what MFers.

    • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s always been my take. The Navy has the experience with big-ship operations, and operating smaller craft from those large ships, and it’s supply and logistics would likely evolve from ocean to space faring ships.
      The Marines are historically an amphibious force, an extension of the Navy, specialized in ship-to-ship and ship-to-shore operations; ship-to-surface would be the evolution of that.

    • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Halo has the UNSC Navy, the UNSC Marines, and the UNSC Army working together in space.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think this is mainly it.

      Additionally, aviation terminology is often very specialized, usually pertaining to aerodynamics and the like. But ship terminology is often more general.

      For example, airplanes have aerofoils and control surfaces, where ships (both space and maritime) have thrusters.

      • techwooded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        While it is true that most early astronauts were aviators, specifically test pilots, it’s also important to consider that it was the case then as it is now that the US Navy operates more planes and has more pilots than the US Air Force. Just percentage wise, that would edge towards more Navy pilots who use the naval terminology in their ranks (the Mercury 7 were 4 Navy pilots, 2 Air Force, and 1 Marine I think, though I could be wrong). I would assume that the culture would skew even more Naval as space flight progresses as early spaceflight was a couple of guys in a tin can to larger scale craft.

        Another weird quirk too is that common military rank terms like “captain” and “lieutenant” don’t line up between the Navy and the others (at least in the US). So the OG Star Trek guys would be Colonel Kirk and Captain Uhura under Air Force terminology, and that just sounds weird

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The USAF has significantly more planes and pilots then the USN.

          However, the USN is technically the second largest air force currently operating in the world, behind the USAF.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah… I don’t know where the claim that the navy has more pilots than the Air Force came from? The Air Force has more than 20k active duty pilots, while the Navy only has around 7k.

        • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Another weird quirk too is that common military rank terms like “captain” and “lieutenant” don’t line up between the Navy and the others (at least in the US). So the OG Star Trek guys would be Colonel Kirk and Captain Uhura under Air Force terminology, and that just sounds weird

          Colonel O’Neill and Captain Carter

      • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you’d have to better define what the culture is that you think would change. For example, I’m sure some terms used on the shuttle are not used at all in other vehicles simply because of its design. I think naval aviators have generally been slightly more numerous in the astronaut corps, although only by a small number. I don’t think any ship has reached the point in size where there’s a dude who is paid to think about things and everyone else hits the buttons.