• rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 小时前

    Damn, that’s promotional material that SanDisk would probably not want to have.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 小时前

      Nah, more like great promo material for the camera that survived the whole mess mostly intact.

      Too bad they dropped the ball by not having the decryption keys for the actual video on the card.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 小时前

      Why? It wasn’t there submersible, their product wasn’t responsible for its destruction and frankly there is very little in the way of public sympathy.

      The product is not even rated as waterproof and yet it’s survived months at the bottom of the ocean after having survived a destructive implosion.

      That’s hella marketing.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 小时前

        The marketing is more for the submersible camera that survived, just like it was designed to do, the SD card was just inside the camera and no water even touched it. I don’t think the SD card should be getting any credit.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 小时前

          Yeah I know but marketing is marketing. It doesn’t really have to make any sense.

          If the Xbox controller had survived I’m sure Microsoft would have made big of that even though it’s basically irrelevant to the product.

    • Ronno@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 小时前

      Why not? If anything, it shows how durable their product is. If it were my company, I would market the shit out of this.