• minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 小时前

    If you ask ChatGPT, it says it’s guidelines include not giving the impression it’s a human. But if you ask it be less human because it is confusing you, it says that would break the guidelines.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 小时前

      ChatGPT doesn’t know its own guidelines because those aren’t even included in its training corpus. Never trust an LLM about how it works or how it “thinks” because fundamentally these answers are fake.

  • cactusfacecomics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    15 小时前

    Seems reasonable to me. If you’re using AI then you should be required to own up to it. If you’re too embarrassed to own up to it, then maybe you shouldn’t be using it.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      14 小时前

      I’m stoked to see the legal definition of “AI”. I’m sure the lawyers and costumed clowns will really clear it all up.

      • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 小时前

        Prosecution: “Your Honor, the definition of artificial is ‘made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally,’ and as all human beings are themselves produced by human beings, we are definitionally artificial. Therefore, the actions of an intelligent human are inherently AI.”

        Defense: “The defense does not argue this point, as such. However, our client, FOX News, could not be said to be exhibiting ‘intelligence.’ Artificial they may be, but AI they are clearly not. We rest our case.”

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 小时前

    But Peter Thiel said regulating AI will bring the biblical apocalypse. ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ

    • shane@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 小时前

      I mean, we call the software that runs computer players in games AI, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • Hungry_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 小时前

        The AI chatbot brainrot is way worse tbh.someone legit said to me why don’t chatgpt cure cancer like wtf

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 小时前

          As if taking all of 4-chan, scrambling it around a little, and pouring the contents out would lead to a cure for cancer. lmao

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 小时前

      USA is run by capitalist grifters. There is no objective meaning under this regime. It’s all just misleading buzzwords and propaganda.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 小时前

    Will someone please tell California that “AI” doesn’t exist?

    This is how politicians promote a grift by pretending to regulate it.

    Worthless politicians making worthless laws.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 小时前

    Yeah for real, what does this mean exactly? All forms of machine learning? That’s a lot of computers at this moment, it’s just we only colloquially call the chat bot versions “AI”. But even that gets vague do reactive video game NPCs get counted as “AI?” Or all of our search algorithms and spell check programs?

    At that point what’s the point? The disclosure would become as meaningless as websites asking for cookies or the number of things known to cause cancer in the state of California.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 小时前

    bleep bloop… I am a real human being who loves doing human being stuff like breathing and existing

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 小时前

    Weird how California keeps being the most progressive state in the US.

    It’s like being the best smelling turd in a toilet, but at least it’s something.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 天前

      My LinkedIn feed is 80% tech bros complaining about the EU AI Act, not a single one of whom is willing to be drawn on which exact clause it is they don’t like.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 小时前

        They’re probably not super fond of the idea of AI not being allowed to be deployed to manipulate people.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 天前

        My LinkedIn feed

        Yes… it’s so bad that I just never log in until I receive a DM, and even then I login, check it, if it’s useful I warn people I don’t use LinkedIn anymore then log out.

        • madjo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 小时前

          I even ignore DMs on linkedIn, they’re mostly head hunters anyway.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 小时前

            Not a terrible resource when you’re actually looking for a job. But that’s because all the automated HR intakes are a dumpster fire, more than anything headhunters bring in value.

      • notarobot@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        Did you seriously use LinkedIn? I always thougt that it was just narsisitic people posting about themselves never having any real conversations and only adding superficial replies to posts that align 100% with them

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 小时前

          Very useful for job hunting because it’s swarming with head hunters.

          LinkedIn gets you access to humans who will help you navigate the shitty HR AI that most big businesses integrate into their job intake process.

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 天前

          If I could delete it without impacting my job or career I would. Sadly they’ve effectively got a monopoly on the online professional networking industry. Cunts

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        I get it though, if you’re an upstart. Having to basically hire an extra guy just to do ai compliance is a huge hit to the barrier of entry

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 天前

          That’s not actually the case for most companies though. The only time you’d need a full time lawyer on it is if the thing you want to do with AI is horrifically unethical, in which case fuck your little startup.

          It’s easy to comply with regulations if you’re already behaving responsibly.

          • Don_alForno@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 天前

            That’s true with many regulations. The quiet part that they’re trying to avoid saying out loud is that behaving ethically and responsibly doesn’t earn them money.