I love to show that kind of shit to AI boosters. (In case you’re wondering, the numbers were chosen randomly and the answer is incorrect).

They go waaa waaa its not a calculator, and then I can point out that it got the leading 6 digits and the last digit correct, which is a lot better than it did on the “softer” parts of the test.

  • diz@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The funny thing is, even though I wouldn’t expect it to be, it is still a lot more arithmetically sound than what ever is it that is going on with it claiming to use a code interpreter and a calculator to double check the result.

    It is OK (7 out of 12 correct digits) at being a calculator and it is awesome at being a lying sack of shit.

    • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      lying sack of shit

      Random tokens can’t lie to you, because they’re strings of text. Interpreting this as a lie is an interesting response

      • swlabr@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        lol the corollary of this is that LLMs are incapable of producing meaningful output, you insufferable turd

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I knew you were a lying promptfondler the instant you came into the thread, but I didn’t expect you to start acting like a gymbro trying to justify their black market steroid habit. new type of AI booster unlocked!

            now fuck off