• 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      So they were enshittifying search engines in advance, so what? AI wasn’t born yesterday.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      When search engine optimization becomes a target, content suffers. If Google changed their algorithm to only rank websites with high quality content instead of keyword-stuffed content, we’d see a great improvement in the quality of the internet.

      • Grenfur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 day ago

        The real kicker is how you even decide what quality is. A one line script that updates a driver may be a solution to your issue. A four page walkthrough that rambles and gets you to your answer but only after an hour is still a solution, but is it better quality? The issue is that you can’t quantify quality. Even if you managed to for something like programming, you couldn’t apply that same logic to horticulture. The issue is that quality isn’t something you can stick in an algorithm.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right, quality is not something that is easy to figure out algorithmically. But adding arbitrary rules like “content length” or “time on page” directly ruins quality by incentivizing content manipulation.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Then someone targets them for pushing their biases because they are deciding quality.