• dwindling7373@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    100 million budget. It’s almost a million a minute and you think they slap stock animations for close up plot points and run the risk of having 5% of the audience going “those number are silly wtf am I watching”?

    • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, absolutely. The big bucks are for A-listed actors, executive producers and gigatons of cocaine, not nerd fan service.

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      3D effects will get a much bigger fraction of the CGI budget than some random animated chart

      • dwindling7373@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No shit. The fraction is not: “google image, upscale, good enough but the alien finger that point at the same screen will get 6 hours to render using 50% of the elecricity of texas”.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Only a handful of movies like Avatar gets actual effort put into fully custom fake interfaces, where the producer has a big vision. But even most other blockbuster releases don’t get that. Fast & The Furious with a dozen movies in the series? Nah. Anything where what’s on the screen is just filler will simply not get a big budget for interfaces. Even for big budget movies.