The shooter who went to a Charlie Kirk event, took one clean shot at Charlie Kirk, saw Charlie Kirk go sideways and left the scene? I wonder what their motive could have been, maybe they would have shot someone else if Charlie Kirk hadn’t been there to bravely catch that bullet.
I’m sure the artist had quite the distinctively well-timed, precise, strikingly vibrant motif throughout their oeuvre.
It drew dramatic reactions from all critics.
If he wasn’t there, someone farther away might have been killed
If he wasn’t there, no one would be shooting.
Do we know enough about the shooter’s motif to be sure about that?
The shooter who went to a Charlie Kirk event, took one clean shot at Charlie Kirk, saw Charlie Kirk go sideways and left the scene? I wonder what their motive could have been, maybe they would have shot someone else if Charlie Kirk hadn’t been there to bravely catch that bullet.
True, we can wonder about it but we will never know for certain
It’s truly a mystery /s
I’m sure the artist had quite the distinctively well-timed, precise, strikingly vibrant motif throughout their oeuvre. It drew dramatic reactions from all critics.