That is what he gets for saying gun violence isn’t a problem and daring people to prove him wrong.
Which means he wanted it, dare if I say: he enjoyed it. Therefore no assassination.
It’s not what he was wearing but how he looked. Ever seen him smile? Creepy as fuck, it’s a wonder nobody shot him sooner.
Funnily, I heard he was wearing a bulletproof vest and the bullet ricocheted off of that vest up into his neck. If that’s true, his clothing did in fact get him killed.
He was not. This has already been categorically debunked over and over again by people who know literally the first thing about ballistics.
Its ok we can have a little misinformation. As a treat
i hear he was wearing a bulletproof neck and it ricocheted off his neck and then his vest just did that
“His neck just did that” is unironically more believable
His neck just gave out feom funneling bullshit
I appreciate that you used “I heard” and “if that’s true”. Word choice can be very important, and it’s frustrating when people don’t notice it.
They’re still repeating bullshit.
True, but they’re not trying to claim otherwise. It’s an honest statement of ignorance, and practically a question. Because it was brought up, anyone reading this who hadn’t heard the truth now has.
The world needs more of this type of thinking
Why thank you!
yeah its fun huh
that is funny
