• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I mean, yeah, that’s pretty much all voting.

    Elected officials never actually get to weigh in on like “Trans people: fully considered as their chosen gender, Y/N?”

    It’s always like “Should we renew the provision that the dept of education is able to recommend limiting student aid funding for teachers’ aide programs that prohibit student teachers from stating, on school grounds, that they have family members who have donated to 501©(4)s that have lobbied against bathroom bills, and also fund repairs for the orphan-crushing machine and the last $5 we need to cure wrist cancer forever?”

    You always have to reverse-engineer a politician’s philosophy, cuz you can never predict exactly what byzantine nonsense they’ll face in the actual role.

    • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They say it so cumbersomely because they know the alternative of saying “Should we gas trans people?” would deter voters from voting on them.

      The real agenda of billionnaire oligarchs, and their fascist allies, ultimately, is complete control.