For months, Google has maintained that the web is “thriving,” AI isn’t tanking traffic, and its search engine is sending people to a wider variety of websites than ever. But in a court filing from last week, Google admitted that “the open web is already in rapid decline” (with regard to advertising, kinda-sorta)

  • MattTheProgrammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    There will be such a thing that arises as a “grey net” I think. Not the dark web, but also not mainstream internet.

  • Frenchfryenjoyer (she/her)@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Not to mention a lot of site traffic is now getting tanked by the UK blocking everything because of the “online safety act” that’s actually anything but (source)

    Most recently my friend couldn’t access a Reddit post about a dental issue of all things because it got marked as NSFW and it asked for her face or ID (can’t remember) so she could see it (I ended up making her download TOR)

      • BanMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        Came out of government-funded research actually. Back when we could still achieve scientific feats on behalf of our country.

        • Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          28 minutes ago

          It was private at that time. My point is that it spread so quickly to millions of people worldwide because of capitalists specifically the telecom companies and ISPs stepping in. Without them, the internet could never have developed on such a scale.

          • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 minutes ago

            The telecom companies got paid by the government to do it, they just as easily could have paid themselves to do it but we as a society are allergic to the idea of taking money out of the hands of poor billionaires and their potential profits

            • Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 minutes ago

              That doesn’t undermine my argument that it was ultimately because of the capitalists that the internet spread in the first place.

          • despicable@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            And how would you know without the internet being developed under a different system at the time?

            • Hikki88@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 minutes ago

              That’s not an argument. I don’t need to speculate on hypotheticals when reality already proves the point.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 minutes ago

        We got internet thanks to scientists and engineers. No amount of capitalists, politicians, managers or business people can create an internet. They say ‘here’s some money to make stuff’ and that’s the limit of their involvement.

  • netuno@lemmy.cif.su
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The problem for years has been good stuff being drowned in slop.

    It’s not going to be fixed.

    • artifex@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ever since search engine “optimization” became a thing — which was not long after the Internet was opened to the public in the ‘90s.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Capitalism has distilled its parasitic behaviour down to a science to suck the life out of anything that dare to stand out, and leave its corpse dry, for the sake of more profits.

  • fuzzywombat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    22 hours ago

    We really need to change the mindset about what the internet experience should be. I think everyone got too used to the idea of centralized services like Google search, Github, Discord, Twitter, reddit, and etc. and that didn’t turn out well. We need to go back to federated protocol based system instead. Let’s go back to the decentralized federated architecture of email, web, irc where no one corporate entity is the sole owner of said service. I think Lemmy and Mastodon are good start but we have to start replace things like Google search, Github, and Discord with decentralized counterparts. We have to learn from our past mistakes and start reconstructing a better internet infrastructure one piece at a time. It will take lot of effort and patience but it’s really the only way out of the mess we put ourselves into by being addicted to simplicity of centralized corporate controlled systems.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The cat is out of the bag and long gone.

      People got used to the simplicity of centralized services, and corpos made great efforts to make everything 1-click.

      So when the average users need to do more than 1-click, they won’t use the software.

      It would help if anti-trust laws were applied and these mega-corpos got broken in a thousand pieces. Centralized monolith services would have a harder time to thrive and give space to federation/decentralization.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Prior to GitHub, everyone just hosted their own Git repositories. The nature of Git is pretty decentralised. And Linux kernel development still uses old-fashioned mailing lists for development co-ordination, rather than something like GitHub. I have heard before someone say the difference between Git and GitHub is similar to the difference between porn and Pornhub.

      Prior to Discord, there was IRC.

      • netuno@lemmy.cif.su
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 hours ago

        the difference between Git and GitHub is similar to the difference between porn and Pornhub.

        🤣

      • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        20 hours ago

        IRC is still there. The user numbers just aren’t that great anymore 😒 I fucking hate discord and what it did and how it took over. And also, of course, murican.

        • underscores@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I hate that everyone fucking uses discord for everything, discord when I’m using it is strictly to game and for online game related activities.

          • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            People are just clueless and lazy, and take the easiest way “that everyone else does too”. And here we are. Recently had to join one…and was asked for a phone number before being allowed to enter. Lol. Yeah sure. Guess I won’t join then 😐

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This makes me think that a big part of the solution is some sort of very low barrier to entry guide or product for self-hosting. Like something even a non-technical person can do. Imagine if it became the norm to have a little always-on device that serves up your personal website, instead of social media accounts…

        • eldebryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          13 hours ago

          We need a startup to just make and try to sorta standardize a mini pc product pre-installed with a proxmox-like setup with an easy web interface and self-hosted solutions pre installed. 5-10 apps for main internet service needs like email, social media, content hosting/publishing and personal media libraries.

          Give it a cute name like “Web-Pal”, keep it open and Customizable for powerusers, watch the internet become a better place while you’re the household name for devices that are as essential as a router.

          • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Exactly my thinking. You could even have some sort of containerized environment so that people can easily just download and run containerized apps for various things. A podman image for your music server, for your photo hosting… almost like apps but less proprietary and less closed source

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I think this is a really good idea. A baby server for every privacy concerned house. Make it simple enough that customizing software features is like putting together Legos, but leave in the potential for complexity as some users grow.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Seriously? WTF? We’re talking current reality here, we can’t do anything to start or stop war, so just keep moving and living.

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      In your analogy I think Google sells chainsaws, lumber, wood stoves, and paper pulp.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    253
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yeah it is, and it’s their fault that it is.

    Google has no right to say the open web is in decline, when they’re the main cause of it, this is basically them saying, ‘Yeah, we won this stupid war that we started, screw you, peons,’ this comes off like if MS broke WINE and then admitted no one uses desktop Linux anymore, it will have been their faults that hypothetical scenario happened, this is what Google saying the open web is in decline when it’s largely their faults that it is comes off as to me.

    • artifex@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well they don’t get all the credit. Oh, wait, they control how much of the market? Ok, nevermind.

      (the DOJ says 91%. Google somehow claims it’s only 10%, to which I literally LOL’d).

      • 8uurg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        That difference is so large, they must be quoting different numbers. Something like DOJ is looking at Advertising providers or search providers alone, while Google quotes a number for percentage of all websites visited or something.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        This is the nub of the issue. Markets need effective competition. Without it, you get fiefdoms and serfs, and shit products. Antitrust laws have been terrible for decades. Thanks to broken political thinking. Smash up the tech monopolies and not just tech will improve.

  • Meron35@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even browsing existing small to medium sized sites has become such a chore, with all these verifications and rate limiters as part of the anti AI scraper effort.

    So many cloudflare verification checkboxes. So many Google sign ins. So many cross site cookies and tracking for even basic functionality.

    Care about privacy and restrict browsing data even a little? Captcha hell.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Especially since discoverability has pretty much gone down the toilet, between SEO and spam sites.

      You’re not going to as easily find a new and interesting website, when the first few results are just computer generated regurgitated text, stuffed with ads by the gill.

      • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Time to bring back the webring and every site having a “links” section.

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          That’s basically unenforceable unfortunately. Search engines are effectively made to be gamed by the way they function. SEO up to a certain point is what makes your website actually findable, it has just gotten out of hand.

    • artifex@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Then you get to load and execute 10MB of JavaScript while another 5MB of ad content loads and displays in the background. With the obligatory two dozen API calls to various trackers, counters, taggers, and “optimizers” in the background of course.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Glad someone else noticed this. I don’t care that the “small” web isn’t as extensive or as polished as the corporate web, but all the anti-scraper stuff and cookie pop-ups are the actual death. It’s horrible.

      Off to gopher and Gemini I guess.

    • Cherry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      And then after all that have to read a page full of ego and and thinly veiled sales waffle just to find the tiny bit of info you are looking for.

      You have to give up too much time and privacy to get little back. It’s not the internet we knew. It’s a hyper monitized sales board.

      I miss being excited about what online would unfurl for me each day.

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Some mainstream websites and services are practically unusable when using a VPN, too. I’m glad I stopped using imgur years ago but I wish the rest of the world would catch up…

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am so fucking exhausted of EVERYTHING in this society being treated like a statistic.

    But what pisses me off even more, is when a gigantic corporation makes a bold claim, pretending they aren’t a major contributor to what’s happening in the said claim