• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Exactly - they don’t work like in the movies. There’s no tactical advantage to them for police. All they really do is protect the hearing of the shooter and make it harder to figure out the exact location of gunfire in the area in combat.

    Law enforcement should want guns to be really loud to draw the attention of other law enforcement and entice citizens to flee if a gunfight breaks out.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s one thing they do. If the job of police was to protect their own hearing - great. But that’s not their job.

        Suppressors make it less-obvious to a novice that a loud sound is a gun, keeping bystanders from fleeing. They also make it harder for other police to determine the direction and distance of gunfire, and when police are shooting, they generally also want backup.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s one thing they do. If the job of police was to protect their own hearing - great. But that’s not their job.

          Dust maska prevent lung damage. If the job of coal miners was to protect their own lungs - great. But that’s not their job

          I hate cops as well, doesn’t mean I don’t understand why they wouldn’t want to become deaf if they ever need to use their gun