• Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    "Before our white brothers arrived to make us civilized men, we didn’t have any kind of prison. Because of this, we had no delinquents. Without a prison, there can be no delinquents. We had no locks nor keys and therefore among us there were no thieves. When someone was so poor that he couldn’t afford a horse, a tent or a blanket, he would, in that case, receive it all as a gift. We were too uncivilized to give great importance to private property. We didn’t know any kind of money and consequently, the value of a human being was not determined by his wealth. We had no written laws laid down, no lawyers, no politicians, therefore we were not able to cheat and swindle one another. We were really in bad shape before the white men arrived and I don’t know how to explain how we were able to manage without these fundamental things that (so they tell us) are so necessary for a civilized society. "

    • John Fire Lame Deer
    • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      A lot of indigineous thinking captured in one passage, particularly restorative justice.

      I was raised Christian but reading texts on Indigineous thought has been what has helped me realize what makes a good person.

      Too much in Abrahamic religions is about obedience and blind submission to authority which is why I often feel drawn to eastern religious thought also. Both Eastern religious thought and the indigineous worldview are more holistic in my view.

      I find Abrahamic religious teachings to be very exclusionary (hey if you beleive what we believe we’ll let you into heaven) Almost like a country club of sorts. Eastern and Indigineous philosophy (with the exception of the caste system warping into a rigid institutionalized social hierarchy due in part to Western influence) seem to be much more inclusionary.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I find Abrahamic religious teachings to be very exclusionary (hey if you beleive what we beleive we’ll let you into heaven) Almost like a country club of sorts.

        So true. Thinking about it, Christian missionaries’ main job is less to sell Jesus, but more to sell FOMO.

        Like a timeshare salesperson, they’re not gonna talk much about the maintenance fees required (such as treating each other the way Jesus said to.) They’re also not gonna talk about how so many of the other share-owners are insufferable to be around and regularly break the agreed-upon rules. Oh, but they will hype up how, for the low, low price of asking Jesus for forgiveness and getting baptized, you, too, could reserve yourself an eternal home in Paradise!