• woland@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    Great. This could be just the boost that free android needs. Graphene and eos can brace for a few new customers i guess

  • tomenzgg@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m probably going to spam this around a bit, since most people don’t seem to know about it, but a reminder that FuriLabs has a (GNU+)Linux phone with decent spec.s and the ability to run Android app.s (from what I’ve heard) pretty decently: https://furilabs.com/

    Biggest drawback is it’s based on Halium. Usual growing pains of a new product/company apply but apparently the company is pretty responsive and their dev.s have worked with customers to get things like calling working with the carrier and bands of their country where it hasn’t worked before so improvements move pretty quickly.

    Collection of different experiences I’ve variously seen online over the last year or so:

    I don’t own one, myself, so I can’t give any personal experience but I’ve seen it around for a few years now but most people don’t seem to even know about it. Maybe there’s a reason for that? But none I’ve ever seen anyone say.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oof, time to bite the bullet and switch email providers. Shit like this is why I’ve spent the last couple years de-googling my life.

    • themadcodger@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Do it! It’s not that bad. Everyone’s got different needs, but I switched to fastmail and have been enjoying it.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        If you’re making the switch anyway, get yourself a domain name from a separate company to run it through. That way in the future you can keep using your domain even if you switch mail/web-hosting providers.

        • themadcodger@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          I have a domain and an email address through it, but my problem is I can’t find a domain name I like enough to both keep and give out to others as a long term contact point. The one I have right now is silly, and not easy to communicate over the phone.

          It’s a me problem, but if I ever figure out something I’m will to keep and is available, that’s the goal.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Google getting rid of all the things that made people want an android phone over an iPhone.

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I mean, there is still UI/UX, app store policies, and general cost/options.

        This definitely makes Android a lot less appealing. But it is also questionable to act like the biggest reason to use android was sideloading apps since the vast majority of users don’t even know that is an option (and probably shouldn’t since they have no understanding of how to vet them). Especially since Apple isn’t any better (?).

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            So… “the ignorance of the masses” should be combatted by willful ignorance and nonsense that falls apart the moment anyone looks at it?

            Get angry. I sure am. Look for alternatives. Graphene sure ain’t it but I hope it will be in the next four or five years. But this is something google are willing to futz with for a reason: The vast majority of users don’t care about it and even with the changes it isn’t significantly worse than the competition.

            Yet everywhere I see “Well, I guess I have to buy Apple now” which is just… buy it if you want to but don’t pretend this shit is why.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s still a step up from iOS, which has had similar restrictions since they started.

    • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Unfortunately, that is 0.1% of their global market that is affected. So, they don’t really have much to lose.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I hope MS doesn’t start doing this to Windows or else that would kill WINE/Proton, and also severely harm Windows itself given how deeply sideloading exes or msi files is ingrained into that OS.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Why would Linux have to respect the certificates? Run whatever random software you want!

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Didn’t the old arm version of windows have this limitation though? It only ran signed exes with a chain of trust?

      I feel like this is probably where things might be heading overall “for our safety”. People saying it’s only the pixel. It’s only the pixel so far. And I think Samsung are locking up bootloaders too. I fully expect both to become the norm.

      Oh you’ll be able to get a phone that isn’t locked this way. With 4 generations out of date hardware at twice the price of the current flagship because it’s a niche product they just can not make at scale to be affordable.

      Also I’ve said it elsewhere, local/personal compute is something I fully expect to become a rare and expensive hobby too.

    • generator@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Right, only install “verified” from Google Play, but that is where malware is, other 3rd party app stores like F-Droid, that really verify apps are at risk of getting killed by Google

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This is very obviously step one in a plan to kill apps like alternative YouTube clients that block ads, just like the Manifest V3 rollout was intended to kill ad blockers in Chrome. Once they have everyone using this verification system, then they can just arbitrarily deverify anything that contravenes whatever new acceptable usage policy they just made up.

    • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Google can’t keep malware off the platform now, but sure, make it mandatory you can’t go anywhere else unless they say so first.

  • xodoh74984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Remember that brief period in the US where, for a fleeting moment, Lina Khan went after a few companies for monopolistic practices?

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    5 hours ago

    How about letting the users decide what to sideload? What the hell?

    I hope the EU is ready to also sue Google.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The EU already forced sideloading to be officially supported on iPhones thanks to the Digital Markets Act, and that law applies to Google as well.

      The US will likely apply pressure, just like they are trying to force their death machines to be legalized on European roads. Apple already tried to pressure the union and failed, but the political climate has changed a bit since then, and while EU bureaucrats can be fierce, European leadership tends to be weak as fuck.

      But yeah, chances are that this change won’t apply to the EU. :)

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          Google is clearly trying to find a loophole here. Their loophole clearly sucks.

          In all likelihood it’ll end up in front of the Court of Justice of the European Union. And in all likelihood Google will lose again.

          The Court of Justice generally seems unimpressed by American lobbyists, so the strategy of finding a dumb loophole is probably doomed to fail.

      • macniel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        European leadership tends to be weak as fuck.

        which is utterly disheartening.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The EU is currently deepthroating Trump so hard that it’s completely out of breath and all our clothes are ruined.

      With how volatile Trump is this could change literally anyday, but with the current political equilibrium all google would have to do is gift trump a shiny golden thing so he makes a threatening remark about gas exports and the EU would go “uwu yes master right away master, do you want to fuck my gaping asshole while you’re at it?”.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 hours ago

    so basically i have to send in my id to google just to sideload a test apk i made in flutter to my own phone to test it out?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Ad it’s just another data point for corporations and governments to be able to tie all your tech activities to your real identity. Great for surveillance!

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well, I mean, we have yet to see an actual serious cyberattack right? Aren’t security needs going to increase, not decrease?

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The US Government hasn’t given a shit about harmful monopolistic practices in a long time. They only pretend to care from time to time to force large companies to start donating to politicians.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “A long time” would be “Since Trump got back in”, since Biden’s administration was actually doing a lot to tackle monopolies. They just did a shit job of advertising what they were doing.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Right, because the single anti-trust action against Microsoft in the 90s is definitely all that was justified during the rise of the tech giants.