• Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    We’ve been doing it for hundreds of years. If you really want to fix something then come up with a plural for “you”; that would be far more helpful.

    You may not notice those times you say “they” like in the examples I already gave, but you do say it, and the only thing tripping you up is that you’re thinking about it. It’s like breathing, it’s weird when you’re paying attention but it’s not wrong and you’ve always done it.

    • anachrohack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s like you didn’t read their comment at all before replying. Singular they feels natural as a 3rd person pronoun for a party whose gender is unknown. When using it to describe a known person, it feels like you’re talking about an unknown person even though you do know them. It does feel weird to say and makes me pause any time I have to say it

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Literally you already do it without a problem. You have, and I would bet large sums of money on it, said in regards to someone well know to you “they forgot it at home” or something to that effect. You already do this without thinking, the only extra layer is that you’re trying not to get it wrong, not that it’s difficult to get it right.

        Just practice some more. You still won’t be perfect but these people literally do not care at all so long as you’re trying and aren’t attempting to take their rights away. They have bigger fish to fry.

        • anachrohack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If the person is well known to me, I would say he/she (if that’s their pronouns), not the 3rd person “they”

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Oh, to be there when you say “they” haha

            Or to watch you struggle to force yourself to say he/she so I “lose”.

            It’s ok, we’ve only been doing it for hundreds of years; it’s just a passing fad, right?

            • anachrohack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I feel like you’re obtusely ignoring the difference in context between how the non-binary “they” is used (which is a new phenomenon) and how the 3rd person of indefinite gender “they” is used

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “You” is the plural of “thou”. It even has plural grammar (“you are”, not “you is”)

      • ExhibiCat@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I thought you was the more respectful form of thou in singular, and “ye” was the plural form of that. In Ireland you still hear ye used for plural you sometimes.

        By more respectful i mean similar to usted in Spanish or vous in French

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You’re saying that as if you speak to an individual and say “you is”. Do you do that?

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            So, singular “you” also has this “plural grammar” you mention and we don’t say “thou” anymore. So what’s your point, then?

            • brisk@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              That was my point.

              You said find a plural for “you”.

              I said that “you” is already a plural.

              That’s it, there’s nothing deeper.

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Ok, then demand we bring “thou” back with the same fervor. Maybe I’m missing that crusade in your life but if you’re gunna go around acting like “they” is difficult I would expect equal frustration with “you”, no?

                • brisk@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  I don’t recall ever suggesting that “they” is difficult. I have in the past used analogy to “you” to help people get comfortable using “they”.

                  • Soup@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    You said it takes mental effort and I’m on a bit of a crusade. Fine, fair enough, but you did bring up unnecessary friction and shit like that is often used as an excuse to not try as hard or excuse people that don’t want to try at all(though yes, you do try).

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t know why you’re being downvoted. You’re correct. Plural they is at least as old as Shakespeare. The notion that it’s only singular is modern.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        People really don’t want to treat trans people properly and they’ll even pretend shit they already do easily is somehow weird and too difficult. I’m just a cis dude over her, with a host of non-binary friends, and for the most part I just say “they” and haven’t died yet. And I fuck it up sometimes and don’t get hung from the rafters like these goons think will happen, probably because the only scenario they know is when they get it wrong on purpose or are otherwise agitating someone.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 minutes ago

          Your anger is on a completely irrational level. I don’t understand trans mentality, because I don’t feel like a man or woman — I just feel like me — though I want what’s best for them (the same as anyone) but referring to someone in the 3rd person makes me feel like I’m referring to someone with schizophrenia or multiple personality disorder. There’s even an old Seinfeld episode about a guy that refers to himself in the 3rd person and comedy ensues, because nobody does that.

          Just because culture and language doesn’t fulfill your requirements or align with your expectations, doesn’t mean that the people of that culture or language are malicious and hateful towards you. The world is not required to bend to your feefees. Hell, the only reason I don’t care about pronouns is because I struggle to remember names… People tend to get offended when you forget their names as it is, now I have to add another dimension I’ll undoubtably fuck up… I can accept trans people being the way they are without giving a fuck, but apparently I can’t expect the same acceptance for my brain being the way it is, and if I don’t dot my I’s and cross my T’s as you see fit I risk being called a bigot, so fuck me I guess…