• Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    While you’re absolutely correct, even if Musk lost 99.7% percent of his wealth he would still be a billionaire (depending on whose net worth number you choose to use). I wouldn’t hold out seeing him in a bread line or starting a gofundme.

    • Fusselwurm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      huh. showerthought:

      broke: gofundme woke: sell shares/stocks bespoke: have your company subsidized by the state

    • howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The real question is whether the collapse of his house of cards will lead to a 99.7% loss of wealth or >100% loss. He won’t be a billionaire anymore if it’s the latter.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        He could declare bankruptcy and be a billionaire again tomorrow.

        And I don’t say this out of any kind of admiration for him; just there’s still enough moneyed rubes out there that he could set up a new company making plumbuses and it would hit unicorn status by the end of the day.

      • Subverb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, he probably will. I know I’d be surprised if he didn’t have money squirreled away somewhere.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’d also be surprised if no one goes after him for trying to run away from debts. If we know anything, it’s that most laws only apply when they benefit the rich, and he’ll be making a lot of rich people angry if it turns out he did have extra money squirreled away.