Prosecution might then assert that it was your responsibility to employ a system that DID allow for censorship. But I hate that one.
Another option would be to refer the offender to the LEOs. Just shift responsibility. Heck, it could be said that you’re doing the LEOs a service. I like that one.
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
Yeah, but that doesn’t answer the question.
The best way to stop censorship is to make it impossible. So, if censorship is impossible, how would you handle illegal conversations?
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
Refer to the replies of others here who are having less difficulty than you. Use the power of Lemmy.
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
Don’t understand >> troll.
That’s efficient
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
If it’s impossible to censor people, you would hardly have a strong prosecution arguing you should have done something impossible.
That’s a good point.
Prosecution might then assert that it was your responsibility to employ a system that DID allow for censorship. But I hate that one.
Another option would be to refer the offender to the LEOs. Just shift responsibility. Heck, it could be said that you’re doing the LEOs a service. I like that one.
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
You got a better one?
spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;